Sorry for confusing in the names. Craig, that distributed build question was intended towards you.
Thanks On Mar 5, 5:11 pm, SMS <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Mark and Craig for your quick responses. > > First of all, my company needs a free version. I do understand, that > Cruise is free uptill two agents. What exactly a agent is doing in > Cruise? > > Mark, what did you mean by "CCNet does not provide distributed build"? > Does that mean that many builds running concurrently? > If yes, this is not the requirement in my case. We have worked very > well with queued builds in CCNet uptil now. Also, security is also not > our priority. > So, do you think, there is no need to go to Cruise, when CCnet is > sufficing our needs? > > Thanks. > > On Mar 5, 4:56 pm, Mark Ryall <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Funny you should ask this question - I need to answer this question for my > > current client. > > There are actually 4 continuous integration products associated with > > thoughtworks that feature the word 'cruise'. It seems that this fact can > > cause a great deal of confusion - they are all similar in concept but > > completely different in implementation. > > >http://ccnet.thoughtworks.com-The open source .net implementation that you > > all know and love (ideally suited for building .net projects) > > >http://cruisecontrol.sourceforge.net-The original open source java > > implementation that started it all (ideally suited for building java > > projects) > > >http://cruisecontrolrb.thoughtworks.com-A more recent open source ruby > > implementation (ideally suited for building ruby projects) > > >http://studios.thoughtworks.com/cruise-continuous-integration-A commercial > > continuous integration tool that was released last year > > > There main features of the commercial version of cruise are > > here:http://studios.thoughtworks.com/cruise-continuous-integration/feature... > > > I'd suggest that you ask your coworkers to demonstrate their perceived > > benefit of using cruise (the specific problems that will be solved by using > > it instead of the open source version). There are a great many things that > > you can do with the commercial version that would require a lot of effort > > using the open source versions (build pipelines, parallellisation, testing > > on multiple platforms etc.). The question is whether your team would > > benefit from doing any of those things. > > > Mark. > > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 9:20 AM, SMS <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I have been using CCNET for more than 3 years now. I have been pretty > > > satisfied with how it works. > > > I just got to know about from Cruise (again by ThoughtWorks). > > > What is the exact difference between these two products? > > > Why should I stick to CCNet when Cruise has come out in market? > > > > I need some substantial answers since I got answer to my c-workers who > > > have been insisting that we should start using Cruise instead of > > > CCNet. > > > > Thanks.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
