Thanks for all the feedback.  Our group will use IE7 to get around the
immediate problem.

Regards,
Peter Priestley.

On Mar 18, 6:13 pm, Ruben Willems <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I know that situation:-(
> we'll see what we can do, maybe it is a small item that must be updated,
> and  if we place some good remarks around it that this is only for IE,
> we can easily clean it up later on.
>
> with kind regards
> Ruben Willems
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 1:01 AM, Sam Calder <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I'm sure the entire userbase agree upgrading is a good thing... but some
> > are not able to upgrade for other reasons (eg. "corporate policy"). I guess
> > its a tradeoff: complicate the code, or keep it simple but 'unusable' for a
> > fraction of the potential userbase. As far as IE6 goes, it is still ~15% of
> > the browser market (third most common after IE7 and FF).
>
> > Cheers,
>
> >  - Sam.
>
> > On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 2:40 AM, Ruben Willems 
> > <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> >> Hi
>
> >> I would upgrade to another version of IE or another browser
> >> there is a lot of movement to get users to upgrade :
>
> >>http://technologyexpert.blogspot.com/2009/02/norwegian-website-encour...
> >>http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/02/19/norway_ie6/
>
> >> all these hacks will make the code harder, and maybe break something on
> >> another browser / version.
>
> >> with kind regards
> >> Ruben Willems
>
> >> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 3:54 AM, Craig & Sammi Sutherland <
> >> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>>  It will probably still occur in 1.4.3, as we haven’t changed any of the
> >>> caching. If someone is willing to be a guinea pig, I could try changing 
> >>> some
> >>> things to see if it improves, otherwise it’s a bit hard as I don’t have
> >>> IE6.0 anymore.
>
> >>> Craig
>
> >>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> >>> *On Behalf Of *Sam Calder
> >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, 17 March 2009 3:16 p.m.
> >>> *To:* [email protected]
> >>> *Subject:* [ccnet-user] Re: Refresh problem on Project Report page in
> >>> 1.4.2
>
> >>> This is a known problem with cacheing in IE6:
>
> >>>http://jira.public.thoughtworks.org/browse/CCNET-1063
>
> >>> It seems it is still unresolved in 1.4.2, I've yet to try the 1.4.3
> >>> release - anyone care to comment?
>
> >>>  On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 6:41 PM, PeterPriestley <
> >>> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>> I've just upgraded from CC.NET 1.1. to 1.4.2.  In general no problems
> >>> doing the upgrade using the 'Optimistic upgrade' procedure.
>
> >>> User viewing the Project Report page for any of our projects see the
> >>> updated page including the day by day history graph.  However, as new
> >>> builds run the Project Report page is not being refreshed.  The graph
> >>> isn't updated with the new builds and the Recent builds list on the
> >>> left bar doesn't change.  There is a message in the blue margin at the
> >>> bottom saying 'This page rendered at: ' and the date/time of the first
> >>> viewing of the page by that user.
>
> >>> Users are using IE6 on Windows XP SP2.
>
> >>> This also applies to some other pages.  (The latest build and updated
> >>> Recent build list can be seen by clicking on Latest Build.)
>
> >>> Clicking the IE6 Refresh button makes no difference.
>
> >>> Deleting the page from the user-side internet explorer cache directory
> >>> does cause the page to be refreshed.
>
> >>> Any thoughts on the cause of this?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Reply via email to