Hi

can you post your ccnet.config
or at least the project


with kind regards
Ruben Willems

On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 12:31 AM, rbr <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> No, I am trying to start and stop a service of ours. However, when I
> put the exec tasks in to the config, the ccnet service cannot be
> started.
>
> Does that make sense? Sorry if this is confusing.
>
> rbr
>
> On Apr 6, 4:02 pm, Ruben Willems <[email protected]> wrote:
> > hi
> >
> > are you trying to stop and start ccnet from within ccnet?
> >
> > with kind regards
> > Ruben Willems
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 11:14 PM, rbr <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Thank you Hans. Unfortunately, in my environment, it is not a trivial
> > > matter to get approval to add a new tool like NAnt. I am working on it
> > > however.
> >
> > > Ruben, I tried following the directions in this link and received an
> > > error where the CC service would not start with these commands in
> > > there. These are supposed to reside within the Tasks section correct?
> >
> > > Best,
> >
> > > rbr
> >
> > > On Apr 3, 12:43 pm, Hans Van Eylen <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > you could use a NAnt task in CCNet. Basically you call a NAnt build
> file
> > > > which uses the servicecontroller task to stop/start services on local
> or
> > > > remote machines :
> > >http://nant.sourceforge.net/release/latest/help/tasks/servicecontroll.
> ..
> >
> > > > Hans
> >
> > > > 2009/4/3 rbr <[email protected]>
> >
> > > > > Hello,
> >
> > > > > I am fairly new to cruise control and am trying to find a way to
> stop
> > > > > a service prior to my triggered MSBuild task and re-start it after
> the
> > > > > build is complete. I know this can be done in MSBuild. However, the
> > > > > MSBuild is shared accross environments that do not all want this
> > > > > behavior implemented. So, I would like to be able to add it to the
> > > > > CCNet.config file. I tried adding  NET STOP and NET START commands
> in
> > > > > the tasks section. But this apparently does not work. At least not
> the
> > > > > way I did it.
> >
> > > > > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > > > > rbr
>

Reply via email to