Nevermind, for some reason before when I'd change the ccnet config,
the server would restart automatically, but this time I had to
manually restart it, and then the change took affect. This is what
ended up working, where MajorVersion is an xml entity and
Versioning.TwoPartVersion is the name of the property I wanted define:
<buildArgs>-D:Versioning.TwoPartVersion=&MajorVersion;</
buildArgs>
On Apr 8, 5:48 pm, Snozz <[email protected]> wrote:
> Any idea how I would find out what version of CCNet supports the
> buildArgs tag for the nant config block?
>
> I think it would allow me to pass a define for a property to nant.
>
> <buildArgs>"-D:Versioning.TwoPartVersion=&MajorVersion;"</buildArgs>
>
> I'm not sure if I'm doing it right or not, but I am using v1.0 of
> CCNet, and I'm afraid to upgrade since I don't wanna break my CI
> Factory setup.
>
> This is the regex I used, if anyone in the future has this problem:
> <regex pattern="(?'regexTwoPartVersion'\d*\.\d*)" input="$
> {CCNetLabel}"/>
>
> -Aaron
>
> On Apr 8, 2:41 pm, Ruben Willems <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi
>
> > for the moment there is no such way
> > but that major version property can it be derived from CCNetLabel?
>
> > suppose CCNetLabel is DailyBuild 2.4.5.6
>
> > is your major label maybe something like 2.4 ?
> > if so, you could use some scripting in Nant to calculate it
>
> > with kind regards
> > Ruben Willems
>
> > On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Snozz <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Is there a way to have CCNet pass additional properties to my nant
> > > scripts, beyond these defaults?
>
> > >http://confluence.public.thoughtworks.org/display/CC/Properties+Passe...
>
> > > In my nant scripts I want to have a major version property that is a
> > > two part version number. I can't use CCNetLabel for this because I
> > > want my CCNetLabel to be a four part version number, and sometimes
> > > with a suffix.
>
> > > I could just declare the property directly in my nant scripts, but
> > > then I'd have two places where it'd need to be edited, because it's
> > > also getting declared as a prefix for the label in the ccnet config.
> > > The developers who will maintain this will surely forget that it has
> > > to be changed in two places.
>
> > > Thanks.
