I think my company's spam filter must have filtered Ruben's response,
but I managed to find it in Google Groups. I have made the changes and
there are now only a single set of the tabs.
 
The problem I have now is that the grids on the first two tabs (Recent
Build Graphs and Historic Build Graphs) display anything except
"Loading...." The detailed data and summarised data grids are working
OK.
 
Any help with this one.
 
Thanks,
Angus.
 
Hi 
this is a known issue, read the release notes at 
http://confluence.public.thoughtworks.org/display/CCNET/CCNet+1.4.3+R...
<http://confluence.public.thoughtworks.org/display/CCNET/CCNet+1.4.3+Rel
ease+Notes>  
*Statistics publishers file requires manual editing* 
The statistics publisher is improved for speed reasons, and the result
is 
that the existing report.xml file must be manually edited. You can find
it 
in the artifact folder and must remove the root element by doing the 
following steps: 
   1. find <statistics> at the beginning of the file and remove it 
   2. find </statistics> at the end of the file, or near the end of the
file 
with kind regards 
Ruben Willems 
________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________
 
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Friday, 24 April 2009 10:44 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [ccnet-user] Statistics problem: tabs display twice and grids
never display data
 
Hey everybody,
 
I have a problem where my statistics do not display correctly.
 
The  tabs up the top are displayed twice (Recent Build Graphs, Historic
Build Graphs, Detailed Data, Summarised Data, Recent Build Graphs,
Historic Build Graphs, Detailed Data, Summarised Data). The data is not
displayed for any of the grids either. Clicking on the tabs sets focus
to both relevant tabs. 
 
I don't actually think it is changing displays  either. Just stays on
the same initial view with the "Build Duration" graph which always
displays "Loading..."
 
Running 1.4.3.4023 of CC.Net
 
Thanks,
Angus.
 

Reply via email to