Thanks Thon - I'm downloading the ISO now and will install tomorrow and
feedback

======================
Dave Carson BEng (hons)

There are 10 types of people..
Those who understand Binary,
and those who don't.....
======================


On 27 May 2010 20:26, Thon Becker <[email protected]> wrote:

> You need Windows SDK 7.1 and .NET Framework 4.0 and that all.
>
>
> http://blogs.msdn.com/b/windowssdk/archive/2010/05/25/released-windows-sdk-for-windows-7-and-net-framework-4.aspx
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: DilbertDave <[email protected]>
> To: ccnet-user <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thu, May 27, 2010 11:45:14 AM
> Subject: [ccnet-user] Building VS2010 projects without installing VS2010
>
> We are currently moving to Visual Studio 2010 and migrating our
> existing VS2005/.NET2.0 projects to .NET3.5.
>
> I committed an updated ASP.NET <http://asp.net/> projects to SVN and then
> modified my
> NAnt scripts to call MSBuild 3.5 and was surprised to see the normal
> CI build succeed!
>
> However I was not so lucky when I attempted to perform a 'deployment'
> build, i.e. building the application and deploying to the test IIS
> server.
> Firstly, although I was building to .NET 3.5 MSBuild 3.5 was not going
> to do the job and after researching the error message (which escapes
> me right now) I found that I had to install .NET 4.0. That's fine,
> it's the base for VS2010 and it will still build to .NET 3.5, no
> problems there.
> So with .NET4.0 installed I thought I was home and free but now I get
> errors relating to aspnet_merge being missing! A quick Google search
> and it looks like I need to install the Windows SDK - which can
> apparently consume 4GB..!!!! I don't have that amount of free space on
> the build server!
>
> So the question is: what do I need to install on the build server
> (which will soon be running CCNet 1.5) in order to build solutions
> developed in VS2010?
>
> Somebody out there must have done it and I won't be the only one who
> will appreciate a few pointers.
>
> Thanks in advance
>
>

Reply via email to