My Bad.
I didn't understand the value was passed by default.
There still is a little problem with the following code :
<cb:define name="Full-Deploy-Block ">
<project name="MyProject">
<workingDirectory>..\branches\$(Path)\...</workingDirectory>
<cb:svn-block svnpath="business/branches/$(Path)"/>
<cb:Inner-Block Path="branches\$(Path)" />
</project>
</cb:define>
<cb:Full-Deploy-Block Path="iphone" />
It does not let me redefine Path in the InnerBlock (if I rename Path it is
OK). Have I forgotten something? By the way, the CC.net crash is quite
violent here : no warn, no error but a good old pop-up with Service Closed.
Thanks for your help OBones.
Benjamin Baumann
2010/9/24 OBones <[email protected]>
> Ok.
>
> But why do you want to specify Target again.
> Once it is defined for Full-Deploy-Block, it is defined for anything
> inside and after it. Notice the "after" because you did not define
> your Full-Deploy-Block to be a scope.
>
> On 24 sep, 14:47, Benjamin Baumann <[email protected]> wrote:
> > No they are in the reverse order in the config file. I reverse it to be
> more
> > readable in the email.
> >
> > 2010/9/24 OBones <[email protected]>
> >
> > > Are they in this order in your config file?
> >
> > > I would have thought you have to define the block before using it for
> > > this to work...
> >
> > > On 23 sep, 11:40, Benjamin Baumann <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> >
> > > > I found an annoying bug/problem. I am using ccnet last stable release
> > > (1.5.
> >
> > > > Here is the case :
> >
> > > > <cb:Full-Deploy-Block Target="DEV" InnerPath="trunk" />
> >
> > > > <cb:define name="Full-Deploy-Block">
> > > > <project name="Projet - $(Target)" >
> > > > <workingDirectory>xxx</workingDirectory>
> > > > <webURL>xxx/$(Target)/ViewProjectReport.aspx</webURL>
> > > > <cb:Inner-Block Target="$(Target)" />
> > > > </project>
> > > > </cb:define>
> >
> > > > With this conf, the Inner-Block is given '$(Target)' instead of DEV.
> I
> > > find
> > > > a work around in renaming Target variable in Environment for the
> > > > Full-Deploy-Block but it's quite annoying. Am I doing something wrong
> or
> > > is
> > > > this a bug?
> >
> > > > With kind rewards,
> > > > Benjamin Baumann
>
