***  For details on how to be removed from this list visit the  ***
***          CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk         ***


Anastassis Perrakis (NKI) wrote:



Power Point is an excellent tool for making your presentation (and I have to admit that Excel is great ... even Word is the best word processor I have seen so far - and yes, I am very good at using LaTex and wrote my thesis on it, but at some point in life we have to face facts... Word, in my opinion, is still better than Apple's Page as a processor although not aesthetically as good... I guess Open Office is simply trying to reproduce Word's functionality with no impressive results or innovative ideas to be honest, although it gets better and better).

I agree, but I prefer Textedit if I'm not pluged into a socket. My PB [EMAIL PROTECTED] (when using Word) goes into sleep after 2:15 h - Word is just a waste of battery life when I type the same stuff in Textedit it's more like 4:00 h (and I switched the 10 minutes backup option to every 30 minutes, in Textedit I do it manualy after I feel that this was a bit of work). If you don't have to worry about that, then Word is fine. Pages is good as an alternative for Webpage design and is less powerful. Whereas Keynote 2 is much better than Powerpoint - although I still miss the ability to draw simple figures within the program I use.


I would not recommend to anyone to use HTML or PDF for presentations: sure you can do so, but if you are starting now making presentations, using Power Point is faster and will give better results. If you had been doing it for 10 years in HTML or PDF, who cares, go on, of course people had given impressive quality presentations in HTML (Dan van Aalten comes into mind now...) but it IS more difficult to handle these.

PDF has a great advantage when you're not presenting on your laptop - it's WYSIWYG - never worry about wrong fonts on the stupid presentation computer. Apple Powerpoint and PC Powerpoint don't use the identical Times font for example - that just screws your presentation. If you use Palatino - for a better reading experience - you can be certain, that what fitted into one line on your Mac will most likely not fit into one line when transferred to a Windows PC using Powerpoint.

What I noticed is that Keynote2 exported to Powerpoint works better than using MS Office Powerpoint on Mac and then copying the files to a Windows system. Why can't an MS product be self consistent ?


At the end of the day, if you are religiously against Microsoft (as I am) then buy a Mac and a Keynote license - it rocks.

Yes, indeed. Ever wanted to know why Tassos gives such great presentations ? Have you ever tried the "Presenter Preview Mode" showing the current total time and time spent on the current slide ? Probably you'll now check out the function :-)


And btw, I cant help noticing, since we are in the presentation tools topic: Your display is typically 1024x768 on a beamer. The biggest picture you ever want to show will take 80% of that, lets say 800x600 to be generous. In RGB color this is less than 1.4 Mb. Do yourselves a favor, and don't use for your talk your 400dpi, 20x30 cm figure you made for your last poster, which is 45 Mb, thirty times bigger. Because, you will slow things down, the computer will crash and you will think you need a new laptop, while you only need to think a bit more ... same advice goes for making figures: don't only think in dpi, think of the expected print size before you render the panels in your favorite ray tracer: since you need at most 400dpi dots-per-inch, so if you know that this figure is only 1x1 inch (a panel in a paper) you need 100 times less pixels (and size) than 10x10 inch than for your poster: 'pixels' - 'dpi' - 'size': make sure you understand the difference.

Back now working in Word - i said I am religious against MS, but I did not say I don't do any sins ;-)

The only reason for keepin Word on a Mac is Endnote :-)


Apologies for the definitely off-CCP4 topic lecture, it seemed a good way to kill 5 mins typing it, and I hope people find it useful, I have given the advice in private and seems that most people appreciated it in the past.

    A.


dito

Juergen

--
--------------------------------------------
Jürgen Bosch
University of Washington
STRUCTURAL GENOMICS OF PATHOGENIC PROTOZOA
Health Science Building
Dept. of Biochemistry, K-418
Box 357742
1705 NE Pacific Street
Seattle, WA 98195-7742
Phone:   206-616-4542
FAX:     206-685-7002
Web:     www.sgpp.org



Reply via email to