***  For details on how to be removed from this list visit the  ***
***          CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk         ***


Hi Folks,

Anyone ever seen anything like this:

"   Taking the results from Round 2
<B><FONT COLOR="#FF0000"><!--SUMMARY_BEGIN-->
  Chains 18, Residues 250, Connectivity Index 0.86
  7 of these (123 residues) have been docked in sequence.
<!--SUMMARY_END--></FONT></B>
------------------------------------------------------
<B><FONT COLOR="#FF0000"><!--SUMMARY_BEGIN-->
QUITING ... PROGRAM TO BLAME: ARP_WARP_MODE_UPDATE_BUILD
QUITING ... PROGRAM TO BLAME: ARP_WARP_MODE_UPDATE_BUILD
QUITING ... PROGRAM TO BLAME: ARP_WARP_MODE_UPDATE_BUILD

*** Look for error message at file: 
/tmp/00002/2006105344/2006105344_warpNtrace_build.last.log
*** Look for error message at file: 
/tmp/00002/2006105344/2006105344_warpNtrace_build.last.log
*** Look for error message at file: 
/tmp/00002/2006105344/2006105344_warpNtrace_build.last.log

<!--SUMMARY_END--></FONT></B>
[1] 24324
CCP4I ERROR:Def file does not exist NOT_DEFINED"

 ok, I know you probably have but this is the end of the offending log file - 
all you have is:

" Comments:  New atoms will be selected if there is any atom exists within  3.30
 Comments:  New atoms will not be put closer than  2.30 to each other
 Comments:  New atoms will have B-factors assigned on the basis of MAPFIND
 -- density hight as expected for resolution range  1.60 20.00
 -- MAPFIND is assumed to be Fo-Fc map in absolute scale
 Comments:  New atoms will have chain name Z and residue name DUM

 -- No real space refinement will be made


 Opening file: arp_out.pdb

 Non-standard orthogonalisation in PDB header
     0.020995   -0.006166   -0.009881
     0.000000    0.021869   -0.003710
     0.000000    0.000000    0.023009

 ***** ERROR *****

 Closing file arp_out.pdb"

The data are good, and the map is nice, but with the spacegroup being P1 the 
completeness is less than ideal at higher (> 2A) resolution... 

Any hints as to what I could do to fix this?

Thanks in advance,

Graeme

Reply via email to