In my experience, both cell parameters and mosaicity, as well as other parameters, can vary quite a bit during data collection of a single crystal, particularly for synchrotron data. As a result, there is no single set of cell parameters that satisfactorily describes a given crystal in all orientations and at all stages during data collection. They are clearly not cell "constants". When refining cell parameters and mosaicity in batches of, say, five frames and then simply calculating average values plus standard deviations, I invariably find a larger spread than that reported in the HKL2000 GUI. This method is probably not entirely accurate, but it demonstrates the variability. So, for describing a particular crystal, a single decimal should be appropriate. For describing a crystal form as a whole, specifying approximate cell parameters, say 120 x 105 x 97 Å, not even bothering with decimal points, should be appropriate, because cell parameters can also vary significantly between crystals. Best - MM On Jun 5, 2006, at 12:34 PM, Yoder, Marilyn wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mischa Machius, PhD Associate Professor UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas 5323 Harry Hines Blvd.; ND10.214A Dallas, TX 75390-8816; U.S.A. Tel: +1 214 645 6381 Fax: +1 214 645 6353 |
- [ccp4bb]: accuracy and precision of unit cell axes Yoder, Marilyn
- Re: [ccp4bb]: accuracy and precision of unit cell axe... Victor Lamzin
- Re: [ccp4bb]: accuracy and precision of unit cell... David W Borhani
- Re: [ccp4bb]: accuracy and precision of unit ... Edward A. Berry
- Re: [ccp4bb]: accuracy and precision of unit cell axe... Edward A. Berry
- Re: [ccp4bb]: accuracy and precision of unit cell axe... Mischa Machius
- Re: [ccp4bb]: accuracy and precision of unit cell axe... Fred. Vellieux
