***  For details on how to be removed from this list visit the  ***
***          CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk         ***


Bart
I (also a non physicist) agree that having two complementary (Bohr's term) 
descriptions is useful as it gives us a fighting chance of understanding at 
least one of them (and thus perhaps posing as physicists). Yes, the undulator 
based description is illuminating and you were right to illuminate.

What I usually do in these circumstances is mix the two approaches at the same 
time. However (from Wikipedia"
"can either behave as a particle or as wave, but never simultaneously as both"
"a stronger manifestation of the particle nature leads to a weaker 
manifestation of the wave nature and vice versa."

So pay your money and take your choice. I guess this also applies to buying one 
of the devices!

Cheers
 Colin
-----Original Message-----
From: Bart Hazes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 July 2006 18:54
To: Nave, C (Colin)
Cc: Ranvir Singh; CCP4 Bulletin Board
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb]: Information on Comapct Light Source


Nave, C (Colin) wrote:
> Inverse Compton or laser micro-undulator?  Now we are getting fundamental!

I'm sure you're right Colin but for the non-physicist the good thing 
about there being two equivalent ways to describe processes in quantum 
mechanics is that often one is a lot easier to comprehend than the 
other. The micro-undulator concept mirrors the properties of the 
physical undulators that most of us are familiar with, that's why I 
brought up the analogy (and truth be told, I didn't even recognize that 
what you were saying was the same thing).

Bart

> My understanding is that there are two ways of describing the process. They 
> are covered in pages 15-18 of the thesis at 
> http://www.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-wrap/getdoc/slac-r-632.pdf, the particle 
> view and the field view.
> 
> I believe either is equally valid. If you can understand how these two views 
> are related, you can also understand how photons can pass through two slits 
> and interfere. Also how x-rays are diffracted by a protein crystal and the 
> individual photons in the diffraction pattern counted on a photon counting 
> detector.
> 
> Perhaps there is additional insight (or even physics) in one of the 
> descriptions. However, I like the quote below
> 
> Colin
> ------------------------------------
> '...Any other situation in quantum mechanics, it turns out, can always be 
> explained by saying, 'You remember the case of the experiment with the two 
> holes? It's the same thing.'
> Richard P. Feynman
> Lectures on Physics:
> The Character of the Physical Law
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bart Hazes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 10 July 2006 15:49
> To: Nave, C (Colin)
> Cc: Ranvir Singh; CCP4 Bulletin Board
> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb]: Information on Comapct Light Source
> 
> 
> 
> My understanding is that this source uses the magnetic field of the 
> laser light as an undulator with about 10T field strength, virtually 
> perfect harmonic behaviour and a few thousand periods over the length of 
> the straight section because the period is only ~700nm long (or whatever 
> laser wavelength they end up using). Because of the high magnetic field 
> you can do with a much lower energy electron storage ring which allows 
> for the small size and "low" operating cost. You indeed change the 
> wavelength by changing the electron energy. Electron bunches are dumped 
> and a fresh one injected every few milliseconds so beam intensity 
> remains virtually constant.
> My expectation is that this technology on paper has the qualitative 
> properties of an excellent undulator beamline but perhaps the brilliance 
> of a strong bending magnet beamline. I believe Donald Ruth is presenting 
> another seminar on his technology at the ACA later this month. 
> Ultimately we have to see a full system up and running to evaluate. The 
> last I heard, the first installation is planned for some time next year.
> 
> Bart
> 
> Nave, C (Colin) wrote:
> 
>>***  For details on how to be removed from this list visit the  ***
>>***          CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk         ***
>>
>>
>>Ranvir
>>
>>This question comes up occasionally (I was asked about this source last 
>>Friday).
>>
>>As I understand it the source is based on a small low energy electron storage 
>>ring and a high average power laser. The photons from the laser receive extra 
>>energy by scattering from the electrons (the inverse Compton effect). The 
>>energy of the electrons is chosen to give x-rays of our desired wavelength. 
>>The set up is designed to give a high average photon flux/brightness. Other 
>>types of inverse Compton facilities are based on linacs (for example) and 
>>short pulse lasers to give a high peak flux of x-rays (short intense pulse) 
>>but with a lower repetition rate.
>>
>>I believe the aim of Compact Light Source is to get performance similar to a 
>>bending magnet on a (second generation?) storage ring. This could sell 
>>provided the cost is reasonable.
>>
>>I presume they are building/testing their prototype and are not releasing too 
>>much information at this stage. I have just looked at their web site and 
>>there are some details there (http://www.lynceantech.com/sci_tech_cls.html).
>>
>>Those thinking of upgrading their data collection facilities would clearly 
>>like to know when the source would be available. I am afraid I can't help 
>>here.
>>
>>Regards
>> Colin
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
>>Ranvir Singh
>>Sent: 07 July 2006 11:31
>>To: CCP4 Bulletin Board
>>Subject: [ccp4bb]: Information on Comapct Light Source
>>
>>
>>***  For details on how to be removed from this list visit the  ***
>>***          CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk         ***
>>
>>
>>Dear members
>>I have been recently informed about 'mini synchrotron'
>>or Compact Light Source, being tested. Lyncean
>>Technologies claims to manufacture room size x- ray
>>source which can provide x-rays comparable in quality
>>and flux to those available at synchrotons. Yet their
>>website has little technical information.
>>I will highly appreciate if any one can provide me
>>with some insights about this new development
>>
>>with best wishes
>>Ranvir
>>
>>__________________________________________________
>>Do You Yahoo!?
>>Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
>>http://mail.yahoo.com 
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 


-- 

==============================================================================

Bart Hazes (Assistant Professor)
Dept. of Medical Microbiology & Immunology
University of Alberta
1-15 Medical Sciences Building
Edmonton, Alberta
Canada, T6G 2H7
phone:  1-780-492-0042
fax:    1-780-492-7521

==============================================================================

Reply via email to