***  For details on how to be removed from this list visit the  ***
***          CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk         ***


When I wrote SHELXL many years ago C-H...O hydrogen bonds had not yet come into fashion, so I made no provision for them. Your suggestion of using BIND to make an additional bond between the H and O should indeed turn off the antibumping restraint, the only possible adverse side-effect would be if you are also trying to place another hydrogen on the oxygen (in which case the connectivitiy would be wrong). A safer method would be to assign PART 1 to H and PART 2 to O, then they will not 'see' each other and no antibumping restraint will be generated.

George

Artem Lyubimov wrote:

I am using SHELX to refine a protein structure where electron density clearly shows what appears to be a rather strong CH - O hydrogen bond between two residues (i.e. Met and Asp are within 2.5A of one another). However, SHELX seems to interpret that as a steric clash and the two residues are pushed apart (and out of density) in the refinement. I'm trying different things to convince SHELX that those atoms indeed belong this close together, but I'd like to ask the pros for ideas, as well. I would prefer to avoid fixing the coordinates of the residues, and using BIND to simulate covalent connectivity between those atoms also seems like a misrepresentation of the situation. So, is there a way to manually specify an individual hydrogen bond in SHELX, rather than let the program find it? I can't find anything about that in the manual. Alternatively, is there a way to selectively turn off the anti-bumping restraints for a group of atoms? I seem to remember a brief discussion on the matter in this forum, and the answer appears to be "no", but I thought I'd ask anyway.

Thanks!
Art

--
Prof. George M. Sheldrick FRS
Dept. Structural Chemistry,
University of Goettingen,
Tammannstr. 4,
D37077 Goettingen, Germany
Tel. +49-551-39-3021 or -3068
Fax. +49-551-39-2582

Reply via email to