***  For details on how to be removed from this list visit the  ***
***          CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk         ***


Hi Folks,

In moments like this the program "pointless" from the CCP4 prerelease
web page is uniquely useful - it will score all of the plausible
spacegroup choices and will give you  the answer in a matter of moments.

Can save a lot of bother!

Cheers,

Graeme 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Rob Gruninger
Sent: 30 November 2006 17:51
To: Michael K Swan
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb]: HKL2000 processing.

***  For details on how to be removed from this list visit the  ***
***          CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk         ***


Hi Michelle,
I had a similar problem which was a result of misindexing.  The data set
indexed as orthorombic but was actually monoclinic.  When I scaled the
data as monoclinic my rejections dropped from several thousand to a
hundred or so.
Regards
Rob

> Hi All,
> I have a question about processing in HKL2000.
> I have a dataset which looks like it will go out to 2.5A but the 
> problem is that when I have integrated the 360 frames (180degrees) to 
> 2.4A I get a large number of rejects on scaling which exceeds the 
> 50000 limit. So is there any way to increase this limit or another 
> method of reducing the number of rejects?
> I can get scaling to work if I either cut the resolution down to 3.0 
> or lower but alternatively if I exclude alot of frames and leave say 
> 90 then the rejects are below 50000 and the scaling produces data that

> looks good to at least 2.6-2.5A according to the I/sigma and an Rmerge
> <0.5 in the final shell, however the completeness suffers due to the 
> low number of frames.
> I should also say that I am suspicious that one of the reasons for all

> the rejects might be that in the centre of the pattern the spots are 
> of a good radial shape but towards the edge they become more 
> elongated. I tried using the elliptical spot feature of HKL2000 but 
> this doesn't seem to be ideal as the spots are not always elongated in
the same direction.
> Any thoughts or suggestions would be much appreciated,
>
> Mike Swan.
>


--
Robert J.Gruninger B.Sc.
Graduate student
Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry
University of Lethbridge, 4401 University Dr.
Lethbridge, AB, Canada, T1K 3M4
Phone:(403)329-2746
Fax:(403)329-2057



Reply via email to