***  For details on how to be removed from this list visit the  ***
***          CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk         ***


It seems it would be trivial to filter for this particular message, either at the recipient side or at the ccp4bb server side. I think this single message is becoming an annoyance for a lot of people. I'm very close to adding a specific filter to my mail program.

James

On Dec 1, 2006, at 3:11 PM, Nikolina Sekulic wrote:

***  For details on how to be removed from this list visit the  ***
***          CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk         ***


Hello,

I've been receiving this very message multiple times yesterday and today. Is there a problem with your server?

Nikolina
On Dec 1, 2006, at 9:52 AM, Michael K Swan wrote:

Hi All,
I have a question about processing in HKL2000.
I have a dataset which looks like it will go out to 2.5A but the problem is that when I have integrated the 360 frames (180degrees) to 2.4A I get a large number of rejects on scaling which exceeds the 50000 limit. So is there any way to increase this limit or another method of reducing the number of rejects? I can get scaling to work if I either cut the resolution down to 3.0 or lower but alternatively if I exclude alot of frames and leave say 90 then the rejects are below 50000 and the scaling produces data that looks good to at least 2.6-2.5A according to the I/sigma and an Rmerge <0.5 in the final shell, however the completeness suffers due to the low number of frames. I should also say that I am suspicious that one of the reasons for all the rejects might be that in the centre of the pattern the spots are of a good radial shape but towards the edge they become more elongated. I tried using the elliptical spot feature of HKL2000 but this doesn't seem to be ideal as the spots are not always elongated in the same direction.
Any thoughts or suggestions would be much appreciated,

Mike Swan.
<michael.swan.vcf>

Reply via email to