OK, I can't resist, I share with everyone what I have already told Art in 
private: I don't think it is a unit. It is a new element in the periodic table. 
Lyubimovium. Properties to be determined. Maybe it can be used for derivatives. 
Hopefully it is a stable and long-lived element.
 
 That is what you get for saying that your last name cannot...
 
 Now let's get back to crystallography. I hope Mike Swan understands that he is 
quite welcome to post questions again (provided that he does not ask for 
acknowledgments that his e-mail has been read :-)
 
 Mark 
    
 -----Original Message-----
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [email protected]
 Sent: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 1:04 PM
 Subject: Re: [ccp4bb]: 'swan' a (new) unit of measure?
 
  if an Angstrom is a unit (I'm told it actually was until recently, even with 
a funny little o on the A :)) and the Becquerel is a unit, why not a Lyubimov? 
MegaLyubimov, picoLyubimov, five Lyubimovs, half a Lyubimov all sound ok to me. 
Mark
  On 5 Dec 2006, at 20:40, Artem Lyubimov wrote: 
 *** For details on how to be removed from this list visit the *** *** CCP4 
home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk  *** 
  
  Aww, c'mon folks. Do we really need to haze the poor guy? It wasn't even his 
fault! 
  For my part, I'm just glad I've got a last name not amenable to becoming a 
unit of measurement. Whew. 
  Art 
  On Dec 5, 2006, at 11:27 AM, Kendall Nettles wrote: 
   *** For details on how to be removed from this list visit the *** *** CCP4 
home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk  *** 
  
  Could be anything repetitive and overwhelming. For example, after looking at 
stacks of crystal trays all morning, I can say "I got swanned." hmmm, maybe we 
should try the detergent screen.... 
  Kendall 
  
   From: James Stroud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 11:07:30 -0800 
To: CCP4 bulletin board <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb]: 'swan' a (new) 
unit of measure? 
  *** For details on how to be removed from this list visit the *** *** CCP4 
home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk  *** 
  
  One mole of emails, as pointed out by Dan Anderson. 
  
  On Dec 5, 2006, at 10:37 AM, Steve Lane wrote: 
   *** For details on how to be removed from this list visit the *** *** CCP4 
home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk  *** 
  
  Is a 'swan' a (new?) unit of measure? And, if so, of what, exactly? 
  I kind of like it ;) 
  -- Steve Lane System, Network and Security Administrator Doudna Lab 
Biomolecular Structure and Mechanism Group UC Berkeley 
  
  On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 10:14:30AM +0100, Flip Hoedemaeker wrote: ---cut---  
Ok, maybe we should stop this thread some time soon, is not just the mail bombs 
that kill you, its the people that start shouting to the board about it. BTW, I 
only received 35 Swans, thats not too bad! 
  Flip  
   
  
   
   Mark J. van Raaij Dpto de BioquĂ­mica, Facultad de Farmacia and Unidad de 
Rayos X, Edificio CACTUS Universidad de Santiago 15782 Santiago de Compostela 
Spain http://web.usc.es/~vanraaij/ 
  
  =   
________________________________________________________________________
Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- 2 GB of storage and industry-leading spam 
and email virus protection.

Reply via email to