Hi,
In view of the recent developing discussion I have a navie question: why isn't
the default for the selection of reflections for the Rfree in ccp4i the "thin
shells" option ?
Boaz
----- Original Message -----
From: Jan Abendroth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, December 29, 2006 22:51
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb]: Retraction of ABC transporter structures - were
therewarning signs?
To: Dean Madden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [email protected]
> *** For details on how to be removed from this list visit
> the ***
> *** CCP4
> home page
> http://www.ccp4.ac.uk ***
>
>
>
> > A way to avoid biasing Rfree values is to choose the test set
> in thin
> > resolution shells whenever NCS is present. Currently, this
> precaution
> > is often ignored. It should become a de facto standard for
> publication
> > of structures containing NCS.
> >
> >
> Hi all,
> btw - it would be fantastic and certainly would encourage us to
> use it
> more often if the assignment of free reflections in resolution
> shells
> was incorporated in a ccp4 program. Yes, one can for instance go
> through
> shelxpro, however if one wants to go back to ccp4 this route is
> a bit
> painful.
>
> Cheers
> Jan
>
> --
> Jan Abendroth
> University of Washington
> Institute of Biochemistry
> 1959 NE Pacific Street, K-426
> Box 357742
> Seattle, WA-98195
> phone: +1-206-616-4510
> fax: +1-206-685-7002
>
>
Boaz Shaanan, Ph.D.
Associate Professor
Dept. of Life Sciences
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Beer-Sheva 84105
Israel
Phone: 972-8-647-2220 ; Fax: 646-1710
Skype: boaz.shaanan‎
