"...They might
also get rectified when you use all of your data for refinement, meaning
when you are not using any R free..."


Sorry to go off on a little tangent here - but doesn't refining against ALL
of your data generally mean that your RFree is no longer your "free" and
cannot be used for cross-validation...

I was always taught that the reflections within the test set are sacrosanct
- is this not also the case for circa atomic resolution data? Perhaps
someone more learned than I could shed a little light on this...

Dave

Hallo to all out there,
>
> I have a problem refining a structure against a 1.33 A resolution data
> set. Using REFMAC (version 5.2.0019, also tested version 5.3) with
> isotropic B-factor refinement resulted in an valid model with R /
> R(free) of 17.8 / 19.2%.
>
> To finish the model I tried to use anisotropic refinement which should
> be possible/reasonable because of an observable to parameter ratio of
> about 2.8. This refinement yielded to a much better R / R(free)-Factor
> of 14.1 / 16.8% and converged after about 15 cycles of anisotropic
> refinement. However the problem is that running a few cycles of
> refinement resulted in warnings, logged as "Problem in MAKE_U_POSITIVE".
>
> So what would be the right solution to overcome this problem?
>
> Some further information about the data set:
>
> spacegroup              P 6(5) 2 2, one protomer per ASU
> cell axis               76.615  76.615  209.787  90.00  90.00 120.00
> unique reflections      83156 (6220)
> Completeness            98.6 % (87.9%)
> I/Sigma                 21.4 (3.5)
> Rmrgd-F                 5.9% (35.0%)
>
> Maybe the refmac-script will be of some help (some other BFAC restraints
> and SPHE/RBON parameter tested, the following example takes care of
> reasonable distribution of anisotropy):
>
> #!/bin/bash
> refmac5 hklin  ../gz_ccp4.mtz \
>         hklout gz_aniso_01f.mtz \
>         xyzin  ./gz_iso.pdb \
>         xyzout gz_aniso_01f.pdb \
>         libin  ../llp_citrat_fitted.cif \
>         << end_ip > refmac.log
> LABI FP=F_cit_01 SIGFP=SIGF_cit_01 FREE=FreeR_flag
> LABO FC=FC FWT=FWT PHIC=PHIC PHWT=PHWT DELFWT=DELFWT PHDELWT=PHDELWT
> FOM=FOM
> NCYC 20
> REFI TYPE RESTRAINED
> REFI RESI MLKF
> REFI METH CGMAT
> REFI RESO 25 1.33
> REFI BREF ANISOTROPIC
> SCAL TYPE BULK
> SCAL LSSC ANISO NCYCLES 10
> SCAL MLSC NCYCLES 10
> WEIG MATRIX 1.25
> SPHE 30.0
> RBON 30.0
> BFAC 0.5 2.0 4.0 4.0 6.0
> MAKE CHECK ALL
> MAKE HYDROGEN ALL
> MAKE HOUT NO
> MAKE PEPTIDE NO
> MAKE CISPEPTIDE NO
> MAKE SSBRIDGE NO
> MAKE CHAIN YES
> MAKE SYMMETRY YES
> MONI MANY TORS 10 DIST 10 ANGL 10 VAND 10 PLANE 10 CHIR 10 BFAC 10 BSPH
> 10 RBOND 10
> BINS 20
> PNAM gz
> DNAM gz
> USEC
> END
> end_ip
>
> The final refinement statistic:
>
> Resolution limits                    =     25.000     1.330
> Number of used reflections           =     81889
> Percentage observed                  =     98.6122
> Percentage of free reflections       =     1.5000
> Overall R factor                     =     0.1409
> Free R factor                        =     0.1681
> Overall weighted R factor            =     0.1348
> Free weighted R factor               =     0.1641
> Overall correlation coefficient      =     0.9763
> Free correlation coefficient         =     0.9688
> Overall figure of merit              =     0.9183
> ML based su of positional parameters =     0.0274
> ML based su of thermal parameters    =     1.5420
> rmsBOND                              =     0.014
> rmsANGLE                             =     1.569
>
> Thanks in advance,
> georg zocher
>
>




--
---------------------------------------
David Briggs, PhD.
Father & Crystallographer
www.dbriggs.talktalk.net
iChat AIM ID: DBassophile

Reply via email to