I am guessing it is a difference in normalization, but I would love to hear a definitive answer from someone.
Steve -----Original Message----- From: CCP4 bulletin board on behalf of mac minista Sent: Wed 2/14/2007 10:59 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [ccp4bb] electron density maps in Coot vs O / Pymol Dear all, I have noticed that going from refmac 5 (script) to generate fo-fc and 2fo-fc maps in O / Pymol once and Coot in the other, the outcome is not exactly the same electron density maps-I mean some differences are seen. I have used the following columns in Coot (latest version): FOFCWT, PHFOFCWT and 2FOFCWT, PH2FOFCWT. The .o map file was generated using FFT, MAPMASK and MAPMAN. I want to know why I am not getting identical maps, and if there is a solution to avoid this problem then I would really appreciate your help. With regards Mac ________________________________ Finding fabulous fares is fun. Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites <http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097;_ylc=X3oDMTFtNW45amVpBF9TAzk3NDA3NTg5BF9zAzI3MTk0ODEEcG9zAzEEc2VjA21haWx0YWdsaW5lBHNsawNxMS0wNw--> to find flight and hotel bargains. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Notice: This e-mail message, together with any attachments, contains information of Merck & Co., Inc. (One Merck Drive, Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA 08889), and/or its affiliates (which may be known outside the United States as Merck Frosst, Merck Sharp & Dohme or MSD and in Japan, as Banyu - direct contact information for affiliates is available at http://www.merck.com/contact/contacts.html) that may be confidential, proprietary copyrighted and/or legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named on this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete it from your system. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
