I would suggest that with 3.1 A data and only half of the scattering mass known, experimental phases would be an easier and better way to go than refining the molrep solution. Even sulphur phases could add if nicely measured, since you would find the S easily in the anomalous Fourier; but of course if its easy to do Se-Met so much for the best.

Having said these, the 4-fold NCS might bail you out, but I would be careful with mask
definitions in DM, it might need a bit more care.

It might also be an idea to switch the solvent correction off in REFMAC
(I am not sure, but I would try it):

SCALE ANIS TYPE LSSC SIMPLE (my syntax might be wrong but keywords are correct)
SOLVENT NO

A.

On Feb 21, 2007, at 21:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Dear all,

Recently, I've gotten a 3.1A data set with a P1 space group. Based on a Mattchew coefficient, I have 4 hetero-dimer molecules in one asymmetric unit. Because one of the dimers was known already, I tried MR with a program Phaser and molrep (Amore doesn't calculate a translation function with a P1 space group). Phaser gave me a reasonable solution with Z-score closed to 20 and LL-gain over 900(molrep didn't give me a good solution), and that solution has 4 molecules with quite reasonable packing with local 2-fold symmetries. I also ran Phaser with different wavelength ranges with different truncated forms, and always the solutions were the same. However, when I calculated the map, the map was still messy and I couldn't see a clear density of the other molecules. I also ran a rigid body refinement and a restrained refinement with different programs (refmac and cns), but the R factor didn't drop. I ran DM with ncs averaging and solvent flattening, still the map wasn't improved. At this moment, we are still sure that our data set has a P1 space group with good statistics and the
solution from phaser is quite reasonable.

Is it possible that P1 space group can be a problem during MR? Do you think the
solution from Phaser is just wrong or did I miss something?

Any suggestions will be helpful to me.

Thanks,




uhnsoo

Reply via email to