Hey Elizabeth,
To answer your second question first, I think if the atom name for water
is "W", it is read as a density peak by shelxl. If you change "W" to "O",
it will read it as water and refine it.
I have some idea about your question about the B-factor. Arg and Met can
often be seen in alternate conformations, so I would check to see if this
is actually the case. When you model these in and refine with 50%
occupancies for both conformations, B-factors might be more reasonable.
Also make sure you have the atoms in the best possible place in the
density in the difference map before you try the alternate conf. Might
work.
Arti


> Dear all,
>
> I am refining a perfectly twinned structure at 1.8 A using
> Shelxl.Currently the Rfactors/Rfree are 20/28%.
>
> I have a problem with the B-values that I get after refinement. Within the
> same residue I may get very low numbers or very high numbers as I show
> below:
>
> ATOM    415  N   ARG  1091     101.144  31.968  -4.016  1.00 14.74
>   N
> ATOM    416  CA  ARG  1091     101.658  32.276  -2.683  1.00 14.88
>   C
> ATOM    417  CB  ARG  1091     100.799  31.584  -1.644  1.00  3.05
>   C
> ATOM    418  CG  ARG  1091     101.034  31.917  -0.187  1.00  7.64
>   C
> ATOM    419  CD  ARG  1091     101.523  33.351  -0.044  1.00 18.07
>   C
> ATOM    420  NE  ARG  1091     101.764  33.779   1.335  1.00 20.18
>   N
> ATOM    421  CZ  ARG  1091     103.009  34.023   1.741  1.00 12.87
>   C
> ATOM    422  NH1 ARG  1091     103.939  33.836   0.817  1.00  5.48
>   N
> ATOM    423  NH2 ARG  1091     103.297  34.415   2.955  1.00 18.82
>   N
> ATOM    424  C   ARG  1091     103.126  31.903  -2.528  1.00 26.11
>   C
> ATOM    425  O   ARG  1091     103.894  32.580  -1.827  1.00 17.11
>
> OR
>
> ATOM    986  N   MET  1162     123.943  36.751  -5.048  1.00 34.77
>   N
> ATOM    987  CA  MET  1162     124.217  35.582  -4.228  1.00 22.54
>   C
> ATOM    988  CB  MET  1162     122.924  34.775  -4.090  1.00 13.02
>   C
> ATOM    989  CG  MET  1162     122.563  34.285  -2.723  1.00 16.29
>   C
> ATOM    990  SD  MET  1162     122.884  35.396  -1.350  1.00157.91
>   S
> ATOM    991  CE  MET  1162     122.264  34.383  -0.003  1.00 29.22
>   C
> ATOM    992  C   MET  1162     125.297  34.673  -4.810  1.00 36.57
>   C
> ATOM    993  O   MET  1162     125.791  33.803  -4.091  1.00 25.97
>   O
>
> My input file looks like this:
>
> LATT -7
> SYMM -X, -Y, 1/2+Z
> SYMM -X, Y, 1/2-Z
> SYMM X, -Y, -Z
> SFAC  C  H  N  O  S  P
> UNIT  37872 70560 9752 11176 192 64
>
> DEFS 0.02 0.1 0.01 0.04
> CGLS 30 -1
> SHEL 30 0.1
> FMAP 2
> PLAN 200 2.3
> LIST 6
> WPDB 2
>
> TWIN 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 -1
> BASF   0.48366
> STIR 2.2 0.05
>
> DELU $C_* $N_* $O_* $S_* $P_*
> SIMU 0.1 $C_* $N_* $O_* $S_* $P_*
> REM ISOR and CONN 0 recommended on adding water
> BUMP
> SWAT
> REM HOPE
>
> REM Remove MERG 4 instruction if Friedel opposites should not be merged
>
> MERG 4
>
>
> Could you please tell me if I am missing some important key word in my
> input file?
>
> Also, once I add water molecules with Coot (for example), how do I tell
> Shelxl to refine them? It seems that it refuses to do it!
> ATOM   7500  W   HOH  4401     101.180  33.600   9.444 1.000 50.00
>
> Thank you!!!!
>
> Eli :o)
>
> --
> Elisabetta Sabini, Ph.D.
> University of Illinois at Chicago
> Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics
> Molecular Biology Research Building, Rm. 1108
> 900 South Ashland Avenue
> Chicago, IL 60607
> U.S.A.
>
> Tel: (312) 996-6299
> Fax: (312) 355-4535
> E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


Arti S. Pandey
Graduate Student
Chemistry and Biochemistry
Montana State University
Bozeman,MT 59717

Reply via email to