Merely encoding our state of knowledge of the space group into the file
header doesn't introduce any additional constraint.  The very fact that
we are uncertain of the correct space group, whether or not that
information is encoded, is already a constraint on what operations can
be sensibly performed on the data.

The unit cell and indexing is uniquely determined by the Bravais lattice
assigned at auto-indexing time, except in the case where you have
already indexed another isomorphous (or near-isomorphous) dataset, and
the default indexing may not be what you want, so provided the Bravais
lattice has been chosen correctly then no re-indexing will be needed
when the space group is assigned.  Provided you stick to the
conventional cell choice based on the Bravais lattice type, then the
selection of space group for a given Bravais lattice has no bearing
whatsoever on the indexing.  Of course if you made the incorrect choice
of Bravais lattice originally, you're going to have to start over
anyway.

-- Ian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Cowtan
> Sent: 09 November 2007 14:52
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] pointless (1.2.0) and enantiomorphic SG's
> 
> Eleanor Dodson wrote:
> > Offering a selection of space groups compatible with a 
> point group will 
> > not require reindexing.
> > Some point groups of course permit reindexing, but one hope 
> you have 
> > chosen a consistent set as you combine data sets into an MTZ file - 
> > pointless and the GUI both offer ways to check this.
> > 
> > Phasing cannot be carried out till you have chosen a 
> spacegroup, and any 
> > existing phase associated data should probably be weeded 
> out as part of 
> > a "Assign Spacegroup" function.
> 
> Good, that makes sense.
> 
> Note however we have introduced a constraint on the data model:
>   - Phasing and multiple spacegroups are inconsistent.
> 
> Actually, IIUC, it's more complicated, since heavy atom 
> location comes 
> before phasing, but produces phases with enantiomorph ambiguity. 
> Grahame's 4-step indicator of uncertainty provides the right sort of 
> framework. But each step is associated with a corresponding set of 
> restrictions on what is valid in the file - and in the case 
> of phases, 
> what they actually mean.
> 
> 


Disclaimer
This communication is confidential and may contain privileged information 
intended solely for the named addressee(s). It may not be used or disclosed 
except for the purpose for which it has been sent. If you are not the intended 
recipient you must not review, use, disclose, copy, distribute or take any 
action in reliance upon it. If you have received this communication in error, 
please notify Astex Therapeutics Ltd by emailing [EMAIL PROTECTED] and destroy 
all copies of the message and any attached documents. 
Astex Therapeutics Ltd monitors, controls and protects all its messaging 
traffic in compliance with its corporate email policy. The Company accepts no 
liability or responsibility for any onward transmission or use of emails and 
attachments having left the Astex Therapeutics domain.  Unless expressly 
stated, opinions in this message are those of the individual sender and not of 
Astex Therapeutics Ltd. The recipient should check this email and any 
attachments for the presence of computer viruses. Astex Therapeutics Ltd 
accepts no liability for damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. 
E-mail is susceptible to data corruption, interception, unauthorized amendment, 
and tampering, Astex Therapeutics Ltd only send and receive e-mails on the 
basis that the Company is not liable for any such alteration or any 
consequences thereof.
Astex Therapeutics Ltd., Registered in England at 436 Cambridge Science Park, 
Cambridge CB4 0QA under number 3751674

Reply via email to