Dear Colleagues,

I agree that the Strep-tag II provides a high end tool compared to the His-tag. In our hands the resin - i.e. StrepTactin affinity matrix either home-made or commercially provided by IBA http://www.iba-go.de/prottools/prot_fr01_01.html - shows exceptional performance:

- It has high specific protein binding capacity, escpecially if one bears in mind that much of the capacity of a metal chelate column is wasted by host cell proteins that usually compete with the His-tagged protein.

- It shows excellent reproducibility, also because no addition of imidazole as well as high salt to the protein extract or preelution steps of non-specifically bound host cell proteins have to be optimized.

- The matrix is extremely robust, at least if not charged with polluted extracts or high amounts of biotin. For example, we have been using a preparative StrepTactin column (50 mL bed volume) for more than two years with several hundred purification runs.

In addition, one should keep in mind that, contrasting with the His-tag, this method does not interfere with metal ions (either bound to the protein of interest or when used for crystallization screens). Also, the Strep-tag chromatography does not affect free Cys residues, which are prone to oxidation catalyzed by Cu(II) or Ni(II).

Thus, we consider the Strep-tag II to be extremely helpful in particular for protein crystallization and, in fact, we have published crystal structures for a series of proteins using this tool. In conclusion, I always recommend to use the Strep-tag II first when purifying a new recombinant proteins because success is almost guaranteed (provided that soluble protein is present at all).

Regarding use of the Strep-tag technique, I may draw your attention to a recent review article in Nature Protocols:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=ShowDetailView&TermToSearch=17571060&ordinalpos=1&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum
I will be happy to provide PDF reprints.

Best regards,
Arne Skerra



3) STREP tag vs His tag - kind of like comparing a sports car to a lorry.
Sometimes you win using one but not the other - however for a generic case I
would nearly always prefer the truck. STREP can be essentially one-step, but
the yields are often quite poor due to low resin capacity and fragility; the
resin is expensive and does not always regenerate well. In comparison,
His-tag nearly always works, usually gives loads of protein (as much as your
system can express in a competent form), gives adequate purity (if you use
His-Select or Talon in combination with detergent lysis you get only a
couple of foreign bands) and is cheap to use and easy to regenerate. So, if
you're working with something crazy or esoteric - some 250 kDa protein that
only expresses in the cerebrospinal fluid of recombinant Madagaskar Chipmunk
embryos - then STREP tag is probably better. For an 'easy' protein expressed
in bacteria, baculovirus, or yeast - His tag is a reasonable default
starting point.

Artem

-----Original Message-----
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Anirban Adhikari
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 5:56 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [ccp4bb] Question about protein expression (not CCP4 related)

Hello,

Sorry about the non CCP4 related question. I have few questions regarding
protein expression:


...

3. Is anyone purifying their protein using the Strep-tag II/Strepactin
affinity system and if so how does it compare to His-tag?

I am looking forward to reading your opinions and suggestions.

Thanks a lot,
Anirban

Anirban Adhikari, Ph. D.
Postdoctoral Research Scholar
Department of Molecular Biology
UT Southwestern Medical Center
5323 Harry Hines Blvd,
Dallas, TX 75390-9063


--

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prof. Dr. Arne Skerra                                  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lehrstuhl f. Biologische Chemie               Phone: +49 (0)8161 71-4351
Technische Universitaet Muenchen                Fax:               -4352
85350 Freising-Weihenstephan
Germany                                         http://www.wzw.tum.de/bc
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to