Re: [ccp4bb] raid array load comments

[Kay Diederichs]

Harry M. Greenblatt schrieb:

BS"D

Thank you to all the respondents.

Some comments:

1. Some believe that the write performance in RAID 5 is only as good as

I'm one of those "some" (based on experience, and a basic understanding of how RAID5 operates). Even 3ware gives performance data for the 9550SX controller (<http://www.3ware.com/KB/attachments/9550SX%20Optimized%20Performance%20Report%20Windows%20Linux%20final%20112905-GUIDe546ff34466349cd891ba2bbcb37295c.pdf>) which show that write performance is only about half of read performance in RAID5 - in an optimized situation.

performance to one disk. This is true only in RAID 3 (under certain conditions), where parity is written as a separate operation to one dedicated parity disk. With distributed parity in RAID 5 this bottleneck is overcome, and write performance is better than single disk limits.

2. These are SATA II drives which are rated at 3Gb/s, or 375MB/s; even if single-drive I/O limits were a problem, we are not reaching this value.

A simple way to come up with realistic upper limits is to run




HTH,

Kay
--
Kay Diederichs                http://strucbio.biologie.uni-konstanz.de
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]    Tel +49 7531 88 4049 Fax 3183
Fachbereich Biologie, Universität Konstanz, Box M647, D-78457 Konstanz

These numbers refer to the SATA II protocol in general, and are an upper limit for the actual speed of transfer between spindle and operating system (i.e. when you transfer only between disk cache and controller, these numbers may be almost reached in favourable cases). However, if the data are on the disk platters or should be written to them, the speed will be on the order of 60 MB/s for these disks. "hdparm -tT /dev/sdX" where X addresses a single disk or RAID array. The first line of output gives the interface speed, and the second the spindle speed. For your application, the latter is the important one. Furthermore, the combination of 3ware controllers, RAID5 and ext3 file systems is known to be slow. XFS should be better, and that's what 3ware recommends for Linux. If you want to try XFS: CentOS has XFS kernel modules and tools. If you want to stay with ext3, make sure you have the latest kernel modules and tools from the 3ware site, and the latest firmware for the controller.

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature