Python 3.0 should have just been named something like "Anaconda" or "Boa"
Actually (and etymologically), Python is an eponym, named after Monty.
Hence, any spin-off should be called Basil or Brian or, a trifle
presumptuously perchance, Holy Grail or Meaning of Life.
--Bruce
Professor of Hegelian Philosophy (and in charge of the sheep dip)
University of Woolamaloo
Australia
Considering Python 3.0 is supposed to be an *improvement* over previous
Pythons, I think a more appropriate name would be "Benny Hill" or "Chris
Rock".
Do you mind if we call you Bruce, just to keep it clear?
Okay then - I'm assuming that your reply (being the Mother of all Non
Sequiturs) is intended facetiously, rather than being the epitome of your
humour-appreciation standards.
If this is not the case, then I would argue that "Brian" is the more
appropriate name, since his fame and reputation were also based on delusions
and misunderstandings.
--Bruce
Professor of Cartesian Philosophy
Bossfella, Department of Philosophy
University of Woolamaloo
(Not to be confused, as some Sheilas apparently do, with the University of
Woolloomooloo)
Australia, Australia, Australia
