Ian,

SHELXL users would also be very happy if mtz files routinely
contained <F^2> and its esd, but I had long regarded this as a
lost cause.

George

Prof. George M. Sheldrick FRS
Dept. Structural Chemistry,
University of Goettingen,
Tammannstr. 4,
D37077 Goettingen, Germany
Tel. +49-551-39-3021 or -3068
Fax. +49-551-39-22582


On Wed, 20 Aug 2008, Ian Tickle wrote:

> Hi Jim
> 
> You can just run Truncate again, exactly as you did before, but this
> time using your truncated.mtz file as input, since it contains the same
> IMEAN/SIGIMEAN columns output by Scala.  It will also give you another
> output mtz file which should be identical to your input mtz (but I
> haven't tested this!).  Truncate will also allow you to assign the
> F/SIGF columns to get a Wilson plot (but no output mtz), but note that
> this is formally incorrect since squaring <F> is not the same as using
> <F^2> (i.e. <F^2> = <F>^2 + var(F)).
> 
> It seems to me that it would be better if in fact Truncate did write out
> a <F^2> column (as well as <F>), because this should really be used in
> place of <F>^2 in Molecular Replacement, native Patterson, F^2 based
> refinement, or indeed anywhere where F^2 is demanded (note that using
> Imeas doesn't help because obviously it's not the same as <F^2> either).
> 
> Cheers
> 
> -- Ian
> 
> > If I've lost my SCALA MTZ, and have only the truncated.mtz 
> > for my dataset, which program is the quickest means of 
> > obtaining a Wilson plot?
> > 
> > Thank you again,
> > Jim
> > 
> > 
> > --- On Wed, 8/20/08, Eleanor Dodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> > > From: Eleanor Dodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Lower completeness, decent R factors, 
> > but low B factor...
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Date: Wednesday, August 20, 2008, 4:30 AM
> > > James Pauff wrote:
> > > > Hello all,
> > > >
> > > > I have a refined structure at 2.6 angstroms that at
> > > about 73% completeness at this resolution.  The I/sigma is
> > > about 2.0 at 2.6 angstroms, and the omit density for my
> > > ligands is great contoured at 3.0sigma.  My Rcryst is 19 or
> > > so and the Rfree is 24.5 or so.
> > > >
> > > > HOWEVER, my mean B value is 13.9, whereas my other 2
> > > structures (at 2.2 and 2.3 angstroms, same protein, >95%
> > > completeness) have mean B values of 22+.  Any suggestions as
> > > to what is going on here?  I'm having trouble explaining
> > > this.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you,
> > > > Jim
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >       
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >   
> > > Have you used TLS - listed B factors will then be given
> > > relative to the 
> > > TLS parameters. You need to run tLSANL to get a more
> > > realistic value.
> > > Eleanor
> > > 
> > > 
> > > But in fact temperature factors are rather harder to
> > > estimate at lower 
> > > resolutions than higher. Look at your <Fo> and
> > > <Fc> curves v resolution 
> > > ( part of a REFMAC loggraph) and you can see that sometimes
> > > the overall 
> > > scaling struggles to get a reasonable fit..
> > 
> > 
> >       
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> Disclaimer
> This communication is confidential and may contain privileged information 
> intended solely for the named addressee(s). It may not be used or disclosed 
> except for the purpose for which it has been sent. If you are not the 
> intended recipient you must not review, use, disclose, copy, distribute or 
> take any action in reliance upon it. If you have received this communication 
> in error, please notify Astex Therapeutics Ltd by emailing [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> and destroy all copies of the message and any attached documents. 
> Astex Therapeutics Ltd monitors, controls and protects all its messaging 
> traffic in compliance with its corporate email policy. The Company accepts no 
> liability or responsibility for any onward transmission or use of emails and 
> attachments having left the Astex Therapeutics domain.  Unless expressly 
> stated, opinions in this message are those of the individual sender and not 
> of Astex Therapeutics Ltd. The recipient should check this email and any 
> attachments for the presence of computer viruses. Astex Therapeutics Ltd 
> accepts no liability for damage caused by any virus transmitted by this 
> email. E-mail is susceptible to data corruption, interception, unauthorized 
> amendment, and tampering, Astex Therapeutics Ltd only send and receive 
> e-mails on the basis that the Company is not liable for any such alteration 
> or any consequences thereof.
> Astex Therapeutics Ltd., Registered in England at 436 Cambridge Science Park, 
> Cambridge CB4 0QA under number 3751674
> 

Reply via email to