> I believe also that in an earlier posting Peter Zwart said he thought > that CNS doesn't take account of the Wilson distribution when doing its > version of the correction; if this is true (and I have no independent > evidence that it is since I'm not a CNS user), then the above argument > implies that the F's corrected by such a procedure will inevitably be > biased, though the damage done may well not be significant compared with > that done by using F's instead of I's in the first place. >
Actually, this is an option in phenix.reflection_file_converter (massage_intensities) and its use is discouraged by forcing the user to use a multitude of keywords at the same time to perform this. That said, I do use this option inside xtriage for space group determination purposes. At the moment it is a quick hack, and something more suitabvle to overcome current limitations is imminent. P
