Hello Carlos
 
thanks for your kindly reply.  I think the cif file ( GLC_mon_lib.cif ) is only 
for one glucose molecule, it can not regulate the bond between two glucose 
units, that is why they break apart in the real space refinement. 
 
in the pdb file , different glucoses are different molecules,   I do not know 
how to generate a cif file to give regulation on bond between glucose units. If 
we can make this cif file , is it the same as GLC_mon_lib.cif?  
 
Thanks a lot for you help .
 
Yours
Lei
> Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 17:23:58 -0600> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] sugar ligand refinement in coot> > Lei,> > 
> If your cif file isn't complete, you can load your pdb GLC in Sketcher in 
> ccp4 suite and generate a cif file. When you have your cif, import your cif 
> file inside coot.> > Carlos> > >>> lei feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/05/08 4:08 
> PM >>>> > hello everyone> > can anyone help me with sugar ( say 
> maltoheptaose) refinement in coot?> > I use the pdb file with " GLC " name , 
> it always breaks apart into discountinuous glucose when I try to use real 
> space refinement , I believe that is because there is no restraint with 
> regarding to bond , whatever in cif file. > > I know I could give it a unique 
> name , say G7 and substitute the " GLC "it in the pdb file, make a new cif 
> file and refine it , it will not break apart again. But , when I deposit the 
> structure in the future , it is allowed? It seems everyone working with sugar 
> ligands are using " GLC" . how did they work in refinement ?> > Thanks for 
> any suggestion. > > lei Feng> 
> _________________________________________________________________> Color 
> coding for safety: Windows Live Hotmail alerts you to suspicious email.> 
> http://windowslive.com/Explore/Hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_safety_112008
_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live Hotmail now works up to 70% faster.
http://windowslive.com/Explore/Hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_faster_112008

Reply via email to