On Nov 18, 2008, at 16:26, William G. Scott wrote:
On Nov 18, 2008, at 7:01 AM, Mischa Machius wrote:
For linux, I would recommend a commercial solution,
For linux, I actually ditched the commercial solution for Ubuntu,
because it was vastly easier as a non-expert to maintain.
Having said that, like you, I have found running Mac OS X to be the
most cost-effective in terms of time and utility.
Same here. Lets also say that I have seen many people in the lab
switch from Linux and Windows to OSX, but nobody from OSX back to
Windows or Linux. That must be saying something.
We still use btw Linux workstations for stereo and I am happy with
them as well.
As Harry says, choose what you are most comfortable with(*).
A.
(*) If thats Windows Vista though, take a break and meditate, think
of the bigger picture of life,
donate to the Bill Gates foundation which is what Bill Gates should be
remembered for,
and find the nearest MacStore. ;-)
Bill
