Dear Dr. Murshudov,
Thank in advance.
I will try the version 5.6 to fix this problem.

Best wishes.

On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Garib Murshudov <[email protected]>wrote:

> This case would happen if the program first decides that the number of twin
> operators are several. But them to be twin cell should be deformed. This
> deformation makes some of the reflections to be equivalent to higher
> resolution reflections than they are.
> After calculating Rmerge and twin fraction the program removes small or
> insignificant twin domains. Then usually there are less twin operators. And
> resolutin to be extended reflections to be equivalent is much less. But the
> program forgot to calculate new "highest" resolution.
>
> It has now been fixed and the version is:
>
> www.ysbl.york.ac.uk/refmac/latest_refmac.html
>
> Regards
> Garib
>
>
> On 22 Jun 2009, at 11:26, Boaz Shaanan wrote:
>
>  I observe the same oddity for linux refmac 5.5.0092
>>
>>         Boaz
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Jiamu Du <[email protected]>
>> Date: Monday, June 22, 2009 7:11
>> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] problem of Refmac refinement on twinning data
>> To: [email protected]
>>
>> > I am using Refmac on a windows xp system.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Jiamu Du
>> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Dear all,
>> > > I am using Refmac version 5.5.0088. The data are twinning, so
>> > the key word
>> > > 'twin' was added into the scripts.
>> > > The refinement result is as pasted below:
>> > >
>> > > REMARK   3 REFINEMENT.
>> > > REMARK   3
>> > PROGRAM     : REFMAC 5.5.0088
>> > > REMARK   3
>> > AUTHORS     : MURSHUDOV,VAGIN,DODSON
>> > > REMARK   3
>> > > REMARK   3    REFINEMENT TARGET :
>> > MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD
>> > > REMARK   3
>> > > REMARK   3  DATA USED IN REFINEMENT.
>> > > REMARK   3   RESOLUTION RANGE HIGH
>> > (ANGSTROMS) :   2.30
>> > > REMARK   3   RESOLUTION RANGE LOW
>> > (ANGSTROMS) :  20.00
>> > > REMARK   3   DATA
>> > CUTOFF            (SIGMA(F)) : NONE
>> > > REMARK   3   COMPLETENESS FOR
>> > RANGE        (%) :  86.58
>> > > REMARK   3   NUMBER OF
>> > REFLECTIONS             :   32643
>> > > REMARK   3
>> > > REMARK   3  FIT TO DATA USED IN REFINEMENT.
>> > > REMARK   3   CROSS-VALIDATION
>> > METHOD          :
>> > THROUGHOUT> REMARK   3   FREE R VALUE TEST
>> > SET SELECTION  : RANDOM
>> > > REMARK   3   R
>> > VALUE     (WORKING + TEST SET) : 0.22929
>> > > REMARK   3   R
>> > VALUE            (WORKING SET) :  0.22749
>> > > REMARK   3   FREE R
>> > VALUE                     :  0.26464
>> > > REMARK   3   FREE R VALUE TEST SET
>> > SIZE   (%) :  4.9
>> > > REMARK   3   FREE R VALUE TEST SET
>> > COUNT      :  1689
>> > > REMARK   3
>> > > REMARK   3  FIT IN THE HIGHEST RESOLUTION BIN.
>> > > REMARK   3   TOTAL NUMBER OF BINS
>> > USED           :      20
>> > > REMARK   3   BIN RESOLUTION RANGE
>> > HIGH           :    2.296
>> > > REMARK   3   BIN RESOLUTION RANGE
>> > LOW            :    2.355
>> > > REMARK   3   REFLECTION IN
>> > BIN     (WORKING SET)
>> > :        0
>> > > REMARK   3   BIN COMPLETENESS
>> > (WORKING+TEST) (%) :     0.00
>> > > REMARK   3   BIN R
>> > VALUE           (WORKING SET) :    0.000
>> > > REMARK   3   BIN FREE R VALUE SET
>> > COUNT          :        0
>> > > REMARK   3   BIN FREE R
>> > VALUE                    :    0.000
>> > > REMARK   3
>> > > REMARK   3  NUMBER OF NON-HYDROGEN ATOMS USED
>> > IN REFINEMENT.
>> > >
>> > > Why are the value of REFLECTION IN BIN, BIN COMPLETENESS, BIN
>> > FREE R VALUE
>> > > SET COUNT, BIN FREE R VALUE all zero?
>> > > Another question is that, my data is of 2.38 angstron
>> > resolutiom, but
>> > > refinement result lists a high resolution of 2.3 angstrom.
>> > > If I did not add the keyword 'twin', all the results are normal.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks and best wishes.
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Jiamu Du, Ph.D.
>> > > State Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology
>> > > Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology
>> > > Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences
>> > > Chinese Academy of Sciences
>> > > 320 Yue-Yang Road
>> > > Shanghai 200031
>> > > P. R. China
>> > > Tel: +86-21-5492-1117
>> > > E-mail: [email protected]
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Jiamu Du, Ph.D.
>> > State Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology
>> > Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology
>> > Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences
>> > Chinese Academy of Sciences
>> > 320 Yue-Yang Road
>> > Shanghai 200031
>> > P. R. China
>> > Tel: +86-21-5492-1117
>> > E-mail: [email protected]
>> >
>>
>> Boaz Shaanan, Ph.D.
>> Dept. of Life Sciences
>> Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
>> Beer-Sheva 84105
>> Israel
>> Phone: 972-8-647-2220 ; Fax: 646-1710
>> Skype: boaz.shaanan
>>
>> ‎
>>
>


-- 
Jiamu Du, Ph.D.
State Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology
Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology
Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences
Chinese Academy of Sciences
320 Yue-Yang Road
Shanghai 200031
P. R. China
Tel: +86-21-5492-1117
E-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to