STFC consultation exercise, or "Do you  want Diamond to thrive?"

Gerd Materlik, Trevor Rayment and Dave Stuart have put the case strongly, see 
forwarded email below.

Apologies if this is duplicated,

Peter



Peter Moody
1/56 Henry Wellcome Laboratories
University of Leicester
Lancaster Road
Leicester
LE1 9HN
UK
tel. (0)116 229 7097
fax. (0)116 229 7084

Times Higher Education University of the Year 2008-9
________________________________
From: Materlik, GT (Gerhard) [[email protected]]
Sent: 24 July 2009 11:34
To: [email protected]
Subject: Important and urgent, please read and respond

Dear Colleague,

STFC, who provides 86% of our budget, is undertaking a complete re-analysis of 
its funding priorities with a view to laying out their future plans this autumn.

The operational budget of Diamond has already been squeezed since the start of 
operations in 2007 and a very significant cut is now proposed for this year 
which cannot be met without impact on the quality of our user programme. A 
further reduction of budget for next year is also being discussed.  If 
implemented, this would inevitably result in a significant reduction in user 
access by not operating some beamlines and by reducing the overall number of 
operating hours. In addition, your continued support for Phase III beamlines is 
essential to secure the future exploitation of the full potential of the 
Diamond facility.

STFC have published a questionnaire which will require your time and careful 
attention.  Deadline for responses is 05:00 PM Thursday 20th August 2009 - 
http://www.stfc.ac.uk/forms/pap.aspx


We urge you to make your views known and respond carefully to the consultation, 
highlighting the priorities for your research field and how they fit into the 
strategic priorities of the Research Councils. The volume and quality of 
responses will be key to determining the future of your science.

Please encourage all of your team and collaborators to respond individually. 
STFC values comments from both current and future leaders of the UK science 
community. Thus, it is important that all of us, PIs, PDRAs and PhD students do 
participate.

Do not underestimate the scale of change that may be imposed for those areas 
not receiving the highest support.

Synchrotron science lies in your hands. Please make your voices heard as the 
future of your field is at stake.

Kind regards,

Gerd Materlik, Trevor Rayment and Dave Stuart


--
Scanned by iCritical.

Reply via email to