Dear Ose, I think we have met similar problems. My protein is relatively small, ~17kD, but it could form aggregates larger than 100nm. A classic Protein Science paper in 2003 by DR Smith titled "Crystal structures of fusion proteins with large-affinity tags" offered me great help. With MBP tag and optimized linker my protein became significantly less aggregated (~10nm). However, this is still far from a guarantee for success since it is still quite difficult to obtain crystals, although Jovine's group reported a recent success about ZP-N.
By the way, can you observe a monomer peak during ultracentrifuge? In terms of DLS, how about the polydispensity? HPV E6 also aggregates to similar size, but the granules were relatively homogeneous. More importantly, it was observed that in cell the protein could still form such large aggregates. Maybe for some proteins, they were just meant to be like this. And based on my very limited knowledge, most structures of such proteins remained as the "higher-hanging fruit". Last but not the least, J Jancarik, et al. designed a elegant protocol (2004，Acta Cryst. D60. 1670-1673.) to find the optimized buffer that could increase the solubiltiy and homogeneity, whichmight be helpful too. Good luck! Xuan Yang 2009/8/27 ose toyoyuki <o...@castor.sci.hokudai.ac.jp> > > Dear all, > > This is a question on how to cope with the protein that seems to form > massive aggregates in solution but enzymatically active. > > I'm working on a protein whose molecular weight is around 70kDa and can be > divided into two domains (say A and B domains). We expressed this protein > in > E.coli fused with GST and purified using some chromatography. The GST > affinity chromatography works well and proteinase digestion to remove the > tag does wonders too. The purified protein was confirmed to be active > enough, we can detect both activities from these two domains. But the > retention time from the gel filtration clearly shows it is awfully > aggregated (comes out at the void region). DLS measurement indicates the > averaged diameter is around 45 nm, which I feel is a bit too long. > Analytical ultracentrifuge result implies that the distribution of the > molecular species is wide, some portion got precipitated with 1K rcf (means > the molecular weight is more than 5MDa) and the rest is ranging from 1MD to > 5MDa with a peak at 1MDa. > I made new two constructs covering the A and B domains respectively, both > of > them are active again, but only the A domain has got the same symptom as > the > intact protein. The B domain seems to exist as a monomer in solution. > > Here come my questions, (I) How can I interpret this phenomenon? (II) Is > there anything we can try to change the situation? (III) Does it make sense > to try crystallization? (probably not).(IV) Has anyone got such experience? > > I tried the methylation on lysine side chains, I also tried the buffer with > 0.2M arginine or 10% glycerol but the all the results just seem hopeless. > The protein before the proteinase treatment also comes out at the void > region from the gel filtration. > > > cheers > > toyoyuki > > --? > Toyoyuki Ose > o...@sci.hokudai.ac.jp > > Graduate School of Life Science > Hokkaido University > N21W11 Kita-ku, Sapporo > 001-0021 Japan >
