James,

I think the standard suggestions apply. Try to tweak your crystallization conditions to get a single crystal (i.e. not a series of stacked plates). PEG 400 can be a good substitute for MPD, but you could also try additive screens as well as co-crystallization with products, cofactors, substrates, analogs, etc. to alter the crystallization.

Alternatively, seek out a beamline that offers X-ray beam diameters of 5-20 microns. You can survey your entire crystal(s) for very small diffracting volumes that might only contain a single plate. You may get lucky.

-Andy

===========================================
Andrew T. Torelli Ph.D.
Postdoctoral Associate
Department of Chemistry & Chemical Biology
Baker Laboratory, Cornell University
Ithaca, NY 14853
===========================================

On 9/3/2009 8:40 AM, james09 pruza wrote:
Deal all,
Sorry for the non-ccp4 query once again. I need suggestions regarding the improvement in crystal quality. I have crystallized a protein in MPD. The crystals grow like a thin plates and the plates are stacked together. So, the mosaicity is very high and also indexing is difficult even at 2 angstrom data set.
All suggestions are welcome.
Thanks.
James.

Reply via email to