Just to point out that Scala does not refine cell parameters: I believe XDS does
Phil On 24 Apr 2010, at 18:57, Peter Grey wrote: > Hi Ingo, > > Scala might be beneficial after xds when several datasets need to be scaled > together. Scala will refine cell parameters to fit best all the datasets > together where as xscale uses as cell parameters those of the first dataset. > If you use xscale you have to be prudent in your choice of the first > dataset. > > Peter. > > On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Ingo Korndoerfer > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> as it turns out: >> >> the bad news (for me) >> >> 1. something went wrong in my data processing. point taken. yes. i was so >> hypnotized by the strange error message, that i did not realize this. >> >> the good news >> >> 2. pointless and scala run just fine (everybody can relax), and the strange >> messages are more an esthetic problem, that phil evans said he will fix in >> the next pointless release. had i looked at the pointless output i would >> have seen, of course, that my data are complete nonsense. embarassing ... >> >> thanks to phil for taking time to look over this, and thanks to the others >> who also replied and asked why i even scale xds data with scala rather than >> xscale. there are reasons for this, but the interesting news for me was, >> that it might be that xscale possibly delivers better data from xds than >> scala does, which, of course, now, i will have to look into ... >> >> time will tell ... >> >> greetings >> >> ingo >> >> > > > -- > Peter
