Interestingly, Maxwell's demon pops up here, whoooo... ,
don't do it.


> If you change the reaction rate in one direction 1000  times slower
> than 
> in the other direction, then the reaction becomes practically 
> irreversible. And the system might not be at equilibrium.
> 
> Maia
> 
> R. M. Garavito wrote:
>> Vinson,
>>
>> As Dale and Randy pointed out, you cannot change the &#916G of a reaction 
>> by mutation: enzyme, which is a catalyst, affects only the activation 
>> barrier (&#916E "double-dagger").  You can just make it a better (or 
>> worse) catalyst which would allow the reaction to flow faster (or 
>> slower) towards equilibrium.  Nature solves this problem very 
>> elegantly by taking a readily reversible enzyme, like an epimerase or 
>> isomerase, and coupling it to a much less reversible reaction which 
>> removes product quickly.  Hence, the mass action is only in one 
>> direction.  An example of such an arrangement is the triose phosphate 
>> isomerase (TIM)-glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) 
>> reaction pair.  TIM is readily reversible (DHA <=> G3P), but G3P is 
>> rapidly converted to 1,3-diphosphoglycerate by GAPDH.   The oxidation 
>> and phosphorylation reactions of GAPDH now make TIM "work" in one 
>> direction.
>>
>> Since many epimerases are very optimized enzymes, why not consider 
>> making a fusion with a second enzyme (like a reductase) to make the 
>> system flow in one direction.  Of course, this depends on what you 
>> want to do with the product. 
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Michael
>>
>> /****************************************************************/
>> /R. Michael Garavito, Ph.D./
>> /Professor of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology/
>> /513 Biochemistry Bldg.   /
>> /Michigan State University      /
>> /East Lansing, MI 48824-1319/
>> /Office://  //(517) 355-9724     Lab:  (517) 353-9125/
>> /FAX:  (517) 353-9334        Email:  rmgarav...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:garav...@gmail.com>/
>> /****************************************************************/
>>
>>
>>
>> On May 18, 2010, at 11:54 AM, Dale Tronrud wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>   I'm more of a Fourier coefficient kind of guy, but I thought that a
>>> &#916G of zero simply corresponded to an equilibrium constant of one.  You
>>> can certainly have reversible reactions with other equilibrium constants.
>>> In fact I think "irreversible" reactions are simply ones where the
>>> equilibrium constant is so far to one side that, in practice, the 
>>> reaction
>>> always goes all the way to product.
>>>
>>>   As Randy pointed out the enzyme cannot change the &#916G (or the 
>>> equilibrium
>>> constant).  You could drive a reaction out of equilibrium by coupling it
>>> to some other reaction which itself is way out of equilibrium (such as
>>> ATP hydrolysis in the cell) but I don't think that's a simple mutation of
>>> your enzyme.  ;-)
>>>
>>> Dale Tronrud
>>>
>>> On 05/18/10 00:31, Vinson LIANG wrote:
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> Sorry for this silly biochemistory question.  Thing is that I have a
>>>> reversible epimerase and I want to mutate it into an inreversible one.
>>>> However, I have been told that the &#916G of a reversible reaction is zero.
>>>> Which direction the reaction goes depends only on the concentration of
>>>> the substrate.  So the conclusion is,
>>>>
>>>> A: I can mutate the epimerase into an inreversible one. But it has no
>>>> influence on the reaction direction, and hence it has little mean.
>>>>
>>>> B: There is no way to change a reversible epimerase into an 
>>>> inversible one.
>>>>
>>>> Could somebody please give me some comment on the two conclution?
>>>>
>>>> Thank you all for your time.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Vinson
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>

Dr.habil. Marius Schmidt
Asst. Professor
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Department of Physics Room 454
1900 E. Kenwood Blvd.
Milwaukee, WI 53211

phone: +1-414-229-4338
email: m-schm...@uwm.edu
http://users.physik.tu-muenchen.de/marius/

Reply via email to