Could any of those strong spots at 2.1 be ice?

---- Original message ----
>Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:13:31 -0700
>From: Lijun Liu <[email protected]>  
>Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Residual densities!  
>To: [email protected]
>
>   Pavel,
>   Thanks for the quick response.  I just listed out
>   the Fo-Fc column of the reflection files, and it
>   looks the strongest densities are mostly along c*
>   and many located in the 2.1A region.  I think you
>   may be right.
>   Lijun
>   On Jul 20, 2010, at 4:05 PM, Pavel Afonine wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     It looks like the data is highly anisotropic -
>     I've seen it many times. You can either apply
>     anisotropy correction
>     (http://www.doe-mbi.ucla.edu/~sawaya/anisoscale/)
>     or use PHENIX tools to compute the maps - anyone
>     of both should help. The major difference between
>     the two is that PHENIX will not modify your
>     original data in any way. Let me if using PHENIX
>     map calculation tools does not help.
>
>     Cheers,
>     Pavel.
>
>     On 7/20/10 3:19 PM, Lijun Liu wrote:
>
>       Hi all,
>       I solved a structure and the refinement is close
>       to complete.  However, some residual density
>       puzzles me.
>       The SG is P212121, and the c is 84.8 Å.  Along
>       c, in several small but not all regions, there
>       are some layered, alternately appeared positive
>       and negative residual density pieces (c is the
>       norm of these plane-like pieces; 3-sigma contour
>       for pos and neg difference densities).  The
>       distance between the neighboring positive pieces
>       is measured to be ~2.1 Å, corresponding to
>       ~1/40 *c.  In one of such region, there is an
>       indole ring of Trp that is approximately
>       parallel to the plane-like residual density
>       pieces (attached figure).  In two other regions,
>       there are Leu or else but not ring structure.
>       The data is complete to 1.9 Å.  Reflection
>       check did not show any special imcompleteness
>       (ice ring loss, wedge loss, other resolution bin
>       loss, etc).  It looks like to me that there is a
>       systematic loss of information which made it is
>       specially sensitive to ~2.1 Å reflections
>       (especially those along c*).  It does not look
>       like to me to be radiation damage.  Crystal was
>       needle and showed somehow polarized (but never
>       serious) diffraction pattern along c*.
>       Attached is a piece of map with the
>       above-mentioned Trp included.  I would like to
>       know if some one also met something like this
>       before.  Thanks for any comments.
>       Lijun Liu
>       Cardiovascular Research Institute
>       University of California, San Francisco
>       1700 4th Street, Box 2532
>       San Francisco, CA 94158
>       Phone: (415)514-2836
>
>   Lijun Liu
>   Cardiovascular Research Institute
>   University of California, San Francisco
>   1700 4th Street, Box 2532
>   San Francisco, CA 94158
>   Phone: (415)514-2836

Reply via email to