Dear Mario,

what is the resolution of the data? Could you try SeMet-MAD/SAD or some other
phasing method to overcome the MR-problem? 

Tim

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 12:54:36PM +0100, Mario Milani wrote:
> Dear all,
> i have a 30 kDa protein that crystallize so far in three different conditions 
> but with the same space group. It initially looks like tetragonal (I4, a=141, 
> b=141, c=208) and then results triclinic (P1, a=141, b=141 c=144, alpha=119, 
> beta=119, gamma=90), hosting about 24 mol. in the unit cell. Other data: self 
> rotation shows the presence of 4 peaks with chi=180; molecular replacement 
> shows the presence of a pseudo-translation peak; DLS made at protein 
> concentration close to crystal growth conditions shows a Rh compatible with 
> something like a tetramer with low polydispersity (about 15%). Do you have 
> any experience with similar ‘asymmetric’ associations? Do you have any 
> suggestions, beside the addition of ligands to the crystal growth conditions, 
> in order to get a ‘simpler’ crystallographic assembly? I have some models 
> (with sequence identity less than 25%) in order to try MR but all trials so 
> far did not solve the structure (using balbes, molrep, phaser and epmr). Any 
> suggestion is welcome.
> Thank you,
> 
> Mario Milani

-- 
--
Tim Gruene
Institut fuer anorganische Chemie
Tammannstr. 4
D-37077 Goettingen

phone: +49 (0)551 39 22149

GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to