The average redundancy is defined as:

          Reflection count before merging  / count after merging

So assuming the numbers in the first table are the counts after
merging, and the number of reflections with redundancy M in one of the
table cells is N(M), then for a given shell (or for all reflections):

merged count = Sum(M) N(M)

unmerged count = Sum(M) M*N(M)

and the average redundancy is the ratio as defined above.

In cases where a range of redundancies are lumped together (e.g. 5-6,
7-8 etc) you'll have to assume an average redundancy for those columns
(e.g. 5.5, 7.5 etc).

Having said all that I'm surprised that the program doesn't work it out for you!

-- Ian

On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Hussain Bhukyagps <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Can any one tell me how to calculate redundancies per shell for the given
> data set here below
>
>     Shell            Summary of observation redundancies by shells:
>   Lower Upper      No. of reflections with given No. of observations
>   limit limit           0     1     2     3     4     5-6     7-8    9-12
> 13-19  >19  total
>   20.00  5.98   115   583  1259  1893  1927  2186   376    23     0     0
> 8247
>    5.98  4.77   110   504  1270  1851  1887  2278   436    28     0     0
> 8254
>    4.77  4.17   103   521  1232  1768  1916  2329   417    20     0     0
> 8203
>    4.17  3.79   115   585  1331  1941  1911  2075   377    24     0     0
> 8244
>    3.79  3.52   101   509  1241  2040  1840  2149   399    25     0     0
> 8203
>    3.52  3.32   119   571  1248  1890  2049  2144   347    18     0     0
> 8267
>    3.32  3.15   146   591  1296  1891  1889  2096   397    29     0     0
> 8189
>    3.15  3.02   174   617  1339  1945  1893  2038   337    16     0     0
> 8185
>    3.02  2.90   154   667  1483  1931  1793  1935   340    17     0     0
> 8166
>    2.90  2.80   207   772  1492  2086  1831  1718   242    13     0     0
> 8154
>  All hkl       1344  5920 13191 19236 18936 20948  3668   213     0     0
> 82112
>
>
>
>      Shell             Summary of observation redundancies:
>   Lower Upper      % of reflections with given No. of observations
>   limit limit          0     1      2      3       4     5-6   7-8   9-12
> 13-19 >19  total
>   20.00  5.98   1.4   7.0  15.1  22.6  23.0  26.1   4.5   0.3   0.0   0.0
> 98.6
>    5.98  4.77   1.3   6.0  15.2  22.1  22.6  27.2   5.2   0.3   0.0   0.0
> 98.7
>    4.77  4.17   1.2   6.3  14.8  21.3  23.1  28.0   5.0   0.2   0.0   0.0
> 98.8
>    4.17  3.79   1.4   7.0  15.9  23.2  22.9  24.8   4.5   0.3   0.0   0.0
> 98.6
>    3.79  3.52   1.2   6.1  14.9  24.6  22.2  25.9   4.8   0.3   0.0   0.0
> 98.8
>    3.52  3.32   1.4   6.8  14.9  22.5  24.4  25.6   4.1   0.2   0.0   0.0
> 98.6
>    3.32  3.15   1.8   7.1  15.5  22.7  22.7  25.1   4.8   0.3   0.0   0.0
> 98.2
>    3.15  3.02   2.1   7.4  16.0  23.3  22.6  24.4   4.0   0.2   0.0   0.0
> 97.9
>    3.02  2.90   1.9   8.0  17.8  23.2  21.6  23.3   4.1   0.2   0.0   0.0
> 98.1
>    2.90  2.80   2.5   9.2  17.8  24.9  21.9  20.5   2.9   0.2   0.0   0.0
> 97.5
>  All hkl        1.6   7.1  15.8  23.0  22.7  25.1   4.4   0.3   0.0   0.0
> 98.4
>
>
>                                    Thank you,
>
> Regards,
> Hussain
>
>
>

Reply via email to