Begin forwarded message:
From: Graeme Winter <graeme.win...@googlemail.com> Date: March 4, 2011 4/3/11 - 4:51 To: José Trincão <trin...@dq.fct.unl.pt> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] XSCALE vs scala Hi Jose, if you are following the usual XDS procedure, the data will have already been scaled by the XDS CORRECT step. XSCALE will perform essentially the same scaling, but for more than one sweep. I usually use scala to merge data from XDS and XSCALE, using "scales constant" - however you could also use XDSSTAT. Best wishes, Graeme On 4 March 2011 16:26, José Trincão <trin...@dq.fct.unl.pt> wrote: Hello all, I've been converting my XDS files (XDS_ASCII.hkl) to mtz using pointless and then running scala to get the work mtz. I like this procedure because I get useful info, (such as Rpim), that I don't know how to get otherwise. I there any advantage/disadvantage of using this procedure instead of scaling and converting with XSCALE and XDSCONV? Thanks! Jose José Trincão, PhD CQFB@FCT-UNL 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal "It's very hard to make predictions... especially about the future" - Niels Bohr José Trincão, PhD CQFB@FCT-UNL 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal "It's very hard to make predictions... especially about the future" - Niels Bohr
