Given that the water and the barium seem to have the same electron density
on image electron…png I’d look careful at relative density levels,
occupancies, B-factors etc. Often the situation becomes clearer during later
stages of refinement. 

 

Peripherally, I also do not exactly understand the difference between ‘split
barium’ and ‘individual barium’. Are two half occupied bariums necessary
non-individuals? The ‘split’ term in crystallography colloquially relates to
multiple conformations of the same entity, which in case of side chains does
require constrained occupancies. This is not necessarily so for isolated
atoms, where the term imho looses its meaning. However, constrained
occupancies can be imposed on individual atoms by split side chain
conformations. I have some examples in the figure library

 

http://www.ruppweb.org/garland/gallery/Ch12/pages/Biomolecular_Crystallograp
hy_Fig_12-33_AandB.htm

Similar but somewhat different situation of correlated occupancies

http://www.ruppweb.org/garland/gallery/Ch13/pages/Biomolecular_Crystallograp
hy_Fig_13-04.htm

 

 

BR 

 

From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Dhanasekaran Varudharasu
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 9:48 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [ccp4bb] About heavy atom split

 

Dear experts,

                        We have solved one protein structure with barium as
a heavy atom using SAD technique. But in the final refinement one barium
site shows split. But the distance between the two positions is 3.8 Å.
Please give your valuable comments and suggestions to conclude whether it is
due to split or due to the occurrence of two individual barium atoms.
Herewith I have enclosed the image files containing the electron density map
at 1.00 sigma level and the anomalous map at 4.00 sigma level for your
reference.

with regards
Dhana


Reply via email to