Hear, hear! I'm glad to know I'm not the last grump left standing. When I raise 
this point every year, my students regard me with bemused stares, as though 
they've just seen a coelacanth swim past their window...


On 1 Apr 2012, at 10:18 AM, Gerard Bricogne wrote:

> Dear Paul,
> 
>     May I join the mostly silent chorus of Greek/Latin-aware grumps who
> wince when seeing "data" treated as singular when it is plural. Related
> instances are
> 
>         * a phenomenon (singular) vs. several phenomena (plural),
>        
>        * a criterion (singular) vs. several criteria (plural)
>        
> and many more.
> 
>     And then there is the infamous mix-up between "principal" (adjective)
> and "principle" (noun, as in Principle of Least Action, or Peter's
> Principle) giving rise to the favourite hero, the "Principle Investigator".
> 
>     This phenomena is now so widespread that perhaps compliance with
> ancient Greek or Latin morphology is no longer a relevant criteria ;-) . 
> 
> 
>     With best wishes,
> 
>          Gerard.
> 
> --
> On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 01:05:10PM +0100, Paul Emsley wrote:
>> The PDBe page for 3k78 says:
>> 
>> "The experimental data has been deposited"
>> 
>> the data cif file says:
>> 
>> "data is under question"
>> 
>> Grump.
>> 
>> Is it to late to refer to data as if there were more than one of them?
>> 
>> Anyway, the data mtz file is here if you want to refine with it:
>> 
>> http://lmb.bioch.ox.ac.uk/emsley/data/r3k78sf.mtz
>> 
>> Paul.
> 
> -- 
> 
>     ===============================================================
>     *                                                             *
>     * Gerard Bricogne                     [email protected]  *
>     *                                                             *
>     * Global Phasing Ltd.                                         *
>     * Sheraton House, Castle Park         Tel: +44-(0)1223-353033 *
>     * Cambridge CB3 0AX, UK               Fax: +44-(0)1223-366889 *
>     *                                                             *
>     ===============================================================

Reply via email to