Hi Xun,

it is difficult to judge without seeing the P(r) plots, but seeing as
you have a dimer in your crystal structure and a dimer in your SAXS,
AND your Chi2 value seems reasonable for a good match between PX and
SAXS, I'd say you've got what you need.

A matching P(r) plot would be nice, but the crysol plot comparing your
SAXS scattering curve and the theoretical scattering curve from your
crystal structure should be enough for a figure.

HTH,

Dave

============================
David C. Briggs PhD
Father, Structural Biologist and Sceptic
============================
University of Manchester E-mail:
[email protected]
============================
Webs : http://flavors.me/xtaldave
Twitter: @xtaldave
Skype: DocDCB
============================


On 16 June 2012 19:29, Xun Lu <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
>
>       I have solved a protein-DNA structure, and I also did SAXS to get some 
> ideas of the solution structure.  The SAXS data were good, no aggregation at 
> all three tested concentrations.  I tried to use Crysol to see if my crystal 
> structure fits the SAXS. The fitting to the scattering profile seems good to 
> me and the Chi2 is 1~1.4.   Then I wanted to see how the P(r) looked like 
> (wanted to make a figure for my paper:).  I calculated the theoretical 
> scattering profile of the crystal structure from an online server (FOXS).  I 
> then run GNOM to make P(r).  To my surprise, this theoretical P(r) looks a 
> little different from the P(r) of SAXS data.  There's a very small bump that 
> was peaked at 70A (Dmax is 108A, which seems reasonable from the crystal 
> structure).   The major peak was at 25A.  As some people said, P(r) is indeed 
> quite sensitive to subtle differences.
>
>        The protein is a dimer in the crystal, although it can also bind DNA 
> as a monomer (much  more loosely).  The estimated MW from SAXS indicates it's 
> a dimer in solution as well.   It seems that I got the information I wanted 
> from the SAXS experiment, but maybe not.  Due to the low resolution of SAXS, 
> maybe I can only say that the majority is a dimer??  Would it be possible to 
> see the monomer if there's only 10% of them in the solution?  How to 
> interpret the discrepancy between the P(r) from crystal and the P(r) from 
> SAXS?
>
>
> Any comments are welcome!
>
>
>
>
> Xun
>
>
> Sent from my iPad

Reply via email to