Ed, Are the numerical results the same ? Not likely that there is a problem. But if you haven't done it already it is worth checking by running the tests provided with the suite. Aggressive optimization can be a source of bugs.
Best regards Thierry -----Original Message----- From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ed Pozharski Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 8:55 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] compiling refmac5 on Ubuntu 12.04 On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 11:37 +0000, Marcin Wojdyr wrote: > Running times were, correspondingly, 32.2s, 35.1s and 18.7s. > Numbers are almost too impressive to believe :) How does it compare with ifort (which I thought should be the fastest option on intel processors and thus unavailable (not free) for most DIY compilation given licensing issues)? -- Oh, suddenly throwing a giraffe into a volcano to make water is crazy? Julian, King of Lemurs Notice: This e-mail message, together with any attachments, contains information of Merck & Co., Inc. (One Merck Drive, Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA 08889), and/or its affiliates Direct contact information for affiliates is available at http://www.merck.com/contact/contacts.html) that may be confidential, proprietary copyrighted and/or legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named on this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete it from your system.
