Is that 300,000 "structures"- or 300,000 "guesses"? I didn't get very far - I'll start running again.... On Jun 19, 2013 5:17 PM, "Peter Artymiuk" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Is that allowing for the fact that each deposition contains approximately > 30 models? If it doesn't take account of that, that could be 300,000 > "structures"; if it does, it could be 300... > > > > On 19 Jun 2013, at 17:07, David Briggs wrote: > > Yeah, but they're mostly wrong though. > > *runs away and hides* > On Jun 19, 2013 5:02 PM, "Gary Battle" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The Worldwide Protein Data Bank (wwPDB; http://wwpdb.org) is excited to >> announce that the number of structures available in the PDB archive >> determined using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy has passed >> the 10,000 mark! >> >> Since the first biomacromolecular NMR structure was archived in 1989, the >> number of NMR-derived structures in the PDB has grown steadily. Last year >> alone over 500 new NMR structures were deposited, more than in the first 10 >> years of NMR depositions combined. Today, NMR-derived structures account >> for more than 10% of the PDB archive which itself will reach the 100,000 >> structure mark in 2014. >> >> You can read more about this milestone achievement and the dedicated >> databases, tools and services that help make this wealth of structural >> information accessible to the scientific community at http://wwpdb.org >> >> on behalf of the wwPDB >> >> -- >> Gary Battle >> Protein Data Bank in Europe (PDBe) >> > > Prof Peter Artymiuk > Krebs Institute > Department of Molecular Biology & Biotechnology > University of Sheffield > Sheffield > S10 2TN > ENGLAND > > > >
