Hi Tim,
A side note: you are most likely not looking at 2Fo-Fc and Fo-Fc maps,
> but a sigma-A weighted maps and sigma-A weighted difference maps. I
> think it is worth differentiating between these terms.
Fully agree. I guess just typing them as 2mFo-DFc and mFo-DFc will solve
this particular confusion. Further on this:
- showing a map without specifying a contouring cutoff level (which also
provides information about how this map was scaled: by standard deviation,
volume or else) isn't very informative;
- was estimate of F000 included?
- which phases were used (model, Pc, or combined model+experimental, Pcomb);
- how phases were used. Example: {mcomb*Fo, Pcomb} - {DFc, Pc} vs {mFo-DFc,
Pc} and other flavors of this;
- are Fc structure factors calculated from atomic model only or it is
actually total model structure factor Fmodel = overall_scale * (Fcalc_atoms
+ Fbulk_solvent)?
All the best,
Pavel
