I have two bits of advice.

1. If the SA omit map for the ssDNA is "really bad", perhaps you should 
reconsider whether your model is a faithful representation of the experimental 
data.

2. You could use anomalous difference Fourier analysis to locate the P atoms of 
the DNA backbone.   We did this for ssDNA bound to a Fab using a data set 
collected at wavelength=1.74 A.  See Figure 3 of

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2516951/


John J. Tanner
Professor of Biochemistry and Chemistry
University of Missouri-Columbia
125 Chemistry Building
Columbia, MO 65211
Phone: 573-884-1280
Fax: 573-882-2754
Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://faculty.missouri.edu/~tannerjj/tannergroup/tanner.html

On Nov 4, 2013, at 10:42 AM, Matthew Franklin 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
 wrote:

Hi Deng -

Can you tell why the reviewer was asking for the SA-omit map?  Is there some 
doubt about the conformation of your ssDNA, or even whether it is present in 
the first place?  Is there a question about the sequence, or the sequence 
register (which nucleotides go in which positions)?

Even a poor-quality map should let you locate the phosphate backbone of the 
DNA.  This should convince most reviewers that the DNA is present and in the 
general position you have modeled.  You can't resolve concerns about nucleotide 
base position or conformation without a better quality map.

I imagine that you built the protein model first during your structure 
determination, and only added the ssDNA later in the refinement.  If this is 
correct, you could present the maps from the last refinement cycle before you 
added the DNA.  This is even less model biased than what the reviewer wants.

Hope that helps,
Matt



On 11/4/13 1:36 AM, dengzq1987 wrote:
Dear all,

 Recently, I received the comments from referees, they asked for the SA-omit 
map of the ssDNA of our protein-DNA complex. They said that simulated annealing 
omit map better than a biased 2Fo-Fc. The ssDNA consists of seven thymidine 
nucleotide. Our data diffracted to 2.65A,but the data quality is not good and 
twin. We tried to produce SA-omit map using phenix. The map is really bad. Does 
anyone have suggestion to refine the map?  Thank you!


Bests,
zq Deng
2013-11-04
________________________________
dengzq1987



--
Matthew Franklin, Ph. D.
Senior Scientist
New York Structural Biology Center
89 Convent Avenue, New York, NY 10027
(212) 939-0660 ext. 9374

Reply via email to