Dear experts,

I am working on one dataset (2.5A) which  was processed using space group 
P43212 ( 107.9, 107.9, 313.7; 90, 90, 90).
After running MR with 6 molecules in ASU and one round of refmac, the R factors 
are high (38%/45%).
I ran phenix.xtriage and found that translational pseudo symmetry is likely 
present. It suggested that the space group is I4122 with the unit cell about 
1/3 smaller (I paste the patterson analyses below).
I tried to reprocess the data to get the suggested space group and unit cell 
using HKL2000. But the index always gives a long c axis about 313A.
Could you provide any suggestions on how to proceed?

 Patterson analyses
------------------

 Largest Patterson peak with length larger than 15 Angstrom

 Frac. coord.        :    0.500    0.500    0.174
 Distance to origin  :   93.757
 Height (origin=100) :   55.763
 p_value(height)     :    3.018e-05


   The reported p_value has the following meaning:
     The probability that a peak of the specified height
     or larger is found in a Patterson function of a
     macro molecule that does not have any translational
     pseudo symmetry is equal to  3.018e-05.
     p_values smaller than 0.05 might indicate
     weak translational pseudo symmetry, or the self vector of
     a large anomalous scatterer such as Hg, whereas values
     smaller than 1e-3 are a very strong indication for
     the presence of translational pseudo symmetry.

The full list of Patterson peaks is:

  x      y      z            height   p-value(height)
( 0.500, 0.500, 0.174 ) :   55.763   (3.018e-05)
( 0.500, 0.500, 0.500 ) :   51.209   (5.796e-05)
( 0.000, 0.000, 0.326 ) :   32.915   (8.699e-04)
( 0.000, 0.000, 0.348 ) :   18.765   (1.266e-02)
( 0.500, 0.500, 0.151 ) :   11.396   (9.756e-02)

 If the observed pseudo translationals are crystallographic
 the following spacegroups and unit cells are possible:

 space group                operator         unit cell of reference setting
 I 41 2 2 (a+1/4,b+1/4,3*c)   x+1/2, y+1/2, z+1/6  (107.94, 107.94, 104.58,  
90.00, 90.00, 90.00)


Thanks,
Dan

Reply via email to