It is definitely P6<something> or P3<something> with a twinning about the unique axis. The differences in merging statistics between P2 P3 and P6 are not very significant in my opinion.
On May 7, 2014, at 1:16 PM, <Rain Field> <[email protected]> wrote: > additional info: > If I let xds go through, it will choose P6. actually pointless suggest > P62/P64. > The thing is the Rmeas and Rmerge are significantly higher for P2/P3/P6 than > P1, especially the highest shell. > That indicates those higher symmetry ones are not the choice, it that right? > (Actually, this is also the reviewer's question) > > > P6 log from xds: > > SUBSET OF INTENSITY DATA WITH SIGNAL/NOISE >= -3.0 AS FUNCTION OF RESOLUTION > RESOLUTION NUMBER OF REFLECTIONS COMPLETENESS R-FACTOR R-FACTOR > COMPARED I/SIGMA R-meas CC(1/2) Anomal SigAno Nano > LIMIT OBSERVED UNIQUE POSSIBLE OF DATA observed expected > Corr > > 8.45 4512 216 239 90.4% 3.1% 3.3% > 4511 95.55 3.2% 100.0* 41* 1.124 182 > 6.27 7208 330 330 100.0% 4.0% 4.0% > 7208 72.47 4.1% 100.0* 22* 1.211 293 > 5.20 8925 401 405 99.0% 5.4% 5.4% > 8925 56.60 5.5% 99.9* 12 0.965 368 > 4.55 10585 470 474 99.2% 6.3% 6.5% > 10585 48.76 6.5% 100.0* 3 0.841 436 > 4.09 11898 529 542 97.6% 9.1% 9.0% > 11898 37.80 9.3% 99.9* -6 0.809 495 > 3.75 12425 550 573 96.0% 16.9% 16.7% > 12425 22.09 17.3% 99.7* 1 0.855 519 > 3.48 14344 638 639 99.8% 26.3% 26.1% > 14344 14.57 26.9% 99.3* -3 0.783 601 > 3.26 15001 668 671 99.6% 53.6% 56.1% > 15001 7.15 54.8% 96.9* -2 0.745 633 > 3.08 14177 704 725 97.1% 114.8% 124.6% > 14165 2.95 117.7% 87.5* -3 0.632 637 > total 99075 4506 4598 98.0% 9.3% 9.5% > 99062 30.73 9.5% 100.0* 1 0.833 4164
