Dear Kristof,

Apart from things pointed out, a possibility to consider would also be the 
presence of two different crystal types--of different compounds--in the same 
reaction vessel.

Best regards,
Navdeep


---
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:00:18AM +0200, Kristof Van Hecke wrote:
> Dear, 
> 
> I’m struggling with the following (small molecule) problem:
> 
> We are trying to solve the structure of a metal-organic framework containing 
> a chiral compound. 
> The space group is most probably Pc, but when refining, SHELX gives the error 
> “Possible racemic twin or wrong absolute structure - try TWIN refinement”. 
> As we know our compound is enantiopure, a racemic twin is very unlikely. In 
> this regard, also a centro-symmetric space group is not possible (although 
> CrysAlisPro always gives P2/c as the proper space group). As a matter of 
> fact, trying different space groups is not solving the problem. 
> 
> The second problem is that half of the structure is visible, but the other 
> half is completely not clear. Refinement is not possible at all (R-value of 
> 33%).
> When running TwinRotMat (Platon), I get the following possible 2-fold twin 
> axes:
> 
> 2-axis (   0   1  -1 ) [  -2   5  -4 ], Angle () [] =  2.31 Deg, Freq =    14
>                         *************
> (-0.992   -0.019    0.015)   (h1)   (h2)                   Nr Overlap =    84
> (-0.430    0.075   -0.860) * (k1) = (k2)                         BASF =  0.96
> ( 0.459   -1.146   -0.083)   (l1)   (l2)                        DEL-R =-0.064
>  
> 2-axis (   0   1   1 ) [   2   5   4 ], Angle () [] =  2.31 Deg, Freq =    15
>                         *************
> (-0.992    0.019    0.015)   (h1)   (h2)                   Nr Overlap =   229
> ( 0.430    0.075    0.860) * (k1) = (k2)                         BASF =  0.94
> ( 0.459    1.146   -0.083)   (l1)   (l2)                        DEL-R =-0.050
>  
> 2-axis (   1   0  -2 ) [   3   0  -2 ], Angle () [] =  0.54 Deg, Freq =    19
>                         *************
> (-0.136    0.000   -0.576)   (h1)   (h2)                   Nr Overlap =   992
> ( 0.000   -1.000    0.000) * (k1) = (k2)                         BASF =  0.86
> (-1.703    0.000    0.136)   (l1)   (l2)                        DEL-R =-0.030
>  
> 2-axis (   1   2  -1 ) [   5   5  -1 ], Angle () [] =  0.39 Deg, Freq =    13
>                         *************
> (-0.380    0.620   -0.124)   (h1)   (h2)                   Nr Overlap =   854
> ( 1.256    0.256   -0.251) * (k1) = (k2)                         BASF =  0.88
> (-0.617   -0.617   -0.877)   (l1)   (l2)                        DEL-R =-0.019
>  
> However, none of these do actually improve the refinement. 
> 
> 
> Has anyone encountered possible twinning/twin laws in Pc please?
> Or any other suggestions are most welcome?
> 
> 
> Thank you very much
> 
> Kristof


---
Navdeep Sidhu
Dept. of Neuropediatrics
University of Goettingen
Germany
Email: [email protected]
Homepage: http://shelx.uni-ac.gwdg.de/~nsidhu
---

Reply via email to