Exactly. Aimless will give you suggested resolution cutoffs based on CC 1/2 in the log file.
Roger Rowlett On Aug 14, 2014 5:04 PM, "conan仙人指路" <conan_...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Hi Faisal, > > CC-half standard is valuable in evaluating the cut-off of highest > resolution. Sometimes even if I/sigI is close to 1 and completeness is not > as high, if CC-half is still significant, it may be worth incorporate the > extra high-res shell data and extend the resolution. Again, if only the > reliability and unbias are carefully confirmed, and the apparent > significant CC-half is not due to an artifact of some other factors like > ice ring etc. > (Ref: Karplus PA and Diederichs K. 2012 Science 336, 1030-1033 > https://www.pubmed.com/pubmed/22628654) > > It has yet to be appreciated by most population of the crystallography > society, unlike the I/sigI, completeness, Rsym. In particular, Rsym has > gradually less a direct measurement of the data quality and or determinant > of resolution cut-off. > > Best, > Conan > > Hongnan Cao, Ph.D. > Department of Biochemistry > Rice University > > ------------------------------ > Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 01:39:48 +0530 > From: faisaltari...@gmail.com > Subject: [ccp4bb] CC-half value ?? > To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK > > Dear all > > How CC-half value of a data set determines the maximum resolution limit > during data processing ?? Although much we know about the Rsym and I/Isig > values of the highest resolution shell while processing the data, what are > the parameters we need to check related to CC-half values ?? > > -- > Regards > > Faisal > School of Life Sciences > JNU > >
