Hi Oliver, Thank you for bringing this issue to my (our) attention. I have already sent a support mail to David because I believe MolProbity is very useful for both research and teaching. Best regards, Nadir
Pr. Nadir T. Mrabet Structural & Molecular Biochemistry N-gere - INSERM U-964 University of Lorraine, Nancy School of Science and Technology and School of Medicine 9, Avenue de la Foret de Haye 54500 Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France Tel. (direct) : +33 (0)3.83.68.32.73 Tel. (secretary) : +33 (0)3.83.68.32.92 Cell. : +33 (0)6 11 35 69 09 Fax. : +33 (0)3.83.68.32.79 Email : Nadir.Mrabet <at> univ-lorraine.fr ----- Mail original ----- > If you find MolProbity a useful tool then please look at the statement > at the top of > http://molprobity.biochem.duke.edu/ > The statement reads: > "URGENT: For the survival of MolProbity, we need your supporting > comments or letters. > The MolProbity renewal NIH grant scored well but not well enough, > and reviewers specifically > asked for more user feedback. Please send us your stories about > how you use MolProbity, > why you value it, and how it has helped your research. We are > resubmitting the grant -- to > maintain the resource, update features, and develop new ways to > help people do much > better at low resolution. > Send to [email protected], before February 20 -- either a > formal letter of support, > or just useful, quotable comments in email. " > I find MolProbity very useful and am just drafting such an email. > Hope it is OK to send this to the ccp4bb. Many people use MolProbity > from their own sites, or > using 3rd party software tools (such as buster-report or the wwPDB > validation server) so they > would not have seen the message. > Oliver > ------------------ > Dr Oliver Smart > Director SmartSci Limited > http://www.smartsci.uk/ > & Consultant Global Phasing Ltd > http://www.globalphasing.com/
